Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

893
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
893
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

267
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
267
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

757
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
757
Choosing Between z and t Distribution01:25

Choosing Between z and t Distribution

2.9K
The z and the Student t distribution estimate the population mean using the sample mean and standard deviation. However, to decide which distribution to use for a calculation, one needs to determine the sample size, the nature of the distribution, and whether the population standard deviation is known. If the population standard deviation is known and the population is normally distributed, or if the sample size is greater than 30, the z distribution is preferred. The Student t distribution is...
2.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nudges in A Learning Health System: Applications to Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Care.

JACC. Advances·2025
Same author

Evaluating adherence to patient registration paperwork guidelines: a mystery shopper study in English primary care.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Perceptions of COVID-19-related nudges in the Arab world: A cross-country analysis of approval rates and associated factors.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

Will we habituate to the decline of democracy?

Science advances·2025
Same author

Driving sustainable change: A systematic map of behaviorally informed interventions to promote sustainable mobility behavior.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Positive and negative framing of complication risk and long-term outcomes influences decision-making in hip and knee arthroplasty.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2024
Same journal

Strange Bedfellows: Native American Tribes, Big Pharma, and the Legitimacy of Their Alliance.

Duke law journal·2019
Same journal

The Promising Viral Threat to Bacterial Resistance: the Uncertain Patentability of Phage Therapeutics and the Necessity of Alternative Incentives.

Duke law journal·2019
Same journal

Deviancy, Dependency, and Disability: the Forgotten History of Eugenics and Mass Incarceration.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

Don’t Try This at Home: the FDA’s Restrictive Regulation of Home Testing Devices.

Duke law journal·2018
Same journal

An administrative right to be free from sexual violence? Title IX enforcement in historical and institutional perspective.

Duke law journal·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K

Choosing not to choose.

Cass R Sunstein1

  • 1Harvard University, United States.

Duke Law Journal
|October 22, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many people prefer not to make decisions, delegating choices to trusted institutions. Insisting on active choosing can be paternalistic, especially when opting out is not allowed.

More Related Videos

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects
08:24

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

17.9K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K
Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects
08:24

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

17.9K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • Choice can be a benefit or a burden.
  • People often avoid making choices due to cognitive limitations and information deficits.
  • Delegating decisions to trusted entities is a common preference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the complex relationship between active choosing and paternalism.
  • To analyze the implications of choice architecture on individual decision-making.
  • To examine the conditions under which individuals prefer to opt out of decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of choice theory and behavioral economics principles.
  • Examination of paternalism in decision-making contexts.
  • Discussion of libertarian and nonlibertarian paternalism frameworks.

Main Results:

  • The line between active choosing and paternalism is often blurred.
  • Forcing active choosing can be a form of paternalism (choice-requiring paternalism).
  • Libertarian paternalism allows opting out of choices, while nonlibertarian paternalism mandates choosing.

Conclusions:

  • The desirability of active choosing versus delegating decisions depends on decision and error costs.
  • Understanding individual preferences for choice or delegation is crucial for effective policy design.
  • Institutions must consider the burden of choice and potential for paternalism when designing systems.