Surgical results of idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane

Kyung Tae Kang1, Kwang Soo Kim, Yu Cheol Kim

  • 1Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Insights

This study compared surgical outcomes for idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) after vitrectomy. Secondary ERM patients achieved better visual acuity, but had higher recurrence rates, suggesting internal limiting membrane removal may reduce recurrence.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Retinal Surgery

Background:

  • Epiretinal membrane (ERM) affects vision.
  • ERMs can be idiopathic or secondary to other conditions.
  • Pars plana vitrectomy with membranectomy is a common surgical treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare surgical results between idiopathic and secondary ERM patients.
  • To evaluate the impact of internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal on recurrence rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 51 patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy and membranectomy for ERM.
  • Comparison of visual acuity, lens status, ILM removal, and recurrence rates.
  • Analysis stratified by idiopathic versus secondary ERM etiology.

Main Results:

  • Both idiopathic and secondary ERM groups showed significant postoperative visual acuity improvement.
  • Secondary ERM group had a higher recurrence rate (20%) compared to idiopathic ERM (4.88%).
  • Internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal was associated with lower recurrence rates in both groups, particularly in secondary ERM.

Conclusions:

  • While secondary ERM patients may achieve better visual gains, they face a higher risk of recurrence.
  • Internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal appears to be a protective factor against ERM recurrence post-surgery.

Related Concept Videos