Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Familial Hypercholesterolemia Human Liver Chimeric Mouse Model Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Hepatocytes
Published on: September 15, 2018
The reduced cost of providing a nationally recognised service for familial hypercholesterolaemia
Robert Pears1, Michael Griffin2, Melanie Watson3
1Department of Public Health , Hampshire County Council , Winchester , UK.
Insights
Implementing new models of care for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) significantly reduces costs. A dual-care model, with general practitioners (GPs) managing patients and specialist support, offers substantial savings for FH services.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Genetics
Background:
- Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a prevalent genetic disorder affecting 1 in 500 UK individuals, significantly increasing coronary heart disease risk.
- Despite National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for genetic testing and cascade screening since 2008, implementation has been slow due to perceived costs.
- Evidence supports the cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits of FH services, yet commissioners have been hesitant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the reduced costs of providing a Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) service utilizing generic atorvastatin.
- To compare the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) costing estimates with three alternative models of care.
- To assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of FH service delivery.
Main Methods:
- A 10-year costing model was developed, revising the existing NICE 3-year template.
- Costs were projected for the first population-based FH service in England (SHIP population: 1.95 million).
- Analysis included the impact of generic atorvastatin, reduced DNA testing costs, and shifts in care management.
Main Results:
- The cost of a 10-year FH service in the SHIP region decreased by 42.5% (£4.88 million to £2.80 million) after the atorvastatin patent expiry.
- Further cost reductions are achievable through lower DNA testing expenses, increased general practice management, and reduced specialist referrals.
- A dual-care model, integrating GP management with specialist support, demonstrated a projected cost of £1.89 million.
Conclusions:
- The three alternative care models evaluated are less than 50% of the original NICE cost estimates.
- Implementing these innovative models can significantly improve the economic viability of FH services.
- These findings support the wider adoption of cost-effective strategies for managing Familial Hypercholesterolaemia.
Objective:
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) affects 1 in 500 people in the UK population and is associated with premature morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease. In 2008, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended genetic testing of potential FH index cases and cascade testing of their relatives. Commissioners have been slow to respond although there is strong evidence of cost and clinical effectiveness. Our study quantifies the recent reduced cost of providing a FH service using generic atorvastatin and compares NICE costing estimates with three suggested alternative models of care (a specialist-led service, a dual model service where general practitioners (GPs) can access specialist advice, and a GP-led service).
Methods:
Revision of existing 3 year costing template provided by NICE for FH services, and prediction of costs for running a programme over 10 years. Costs were modelled for the first population-based FH service in England which covers Southampton, Hampshire, Isle of Wight and Portsmouth (SHIP). Population 1.95 million.
Results:
With expiry of the Lipitor (Pfizer atorvastatin) patent the cost of providing a 10-year FH service in SHIP reduces by 42.5% (£4.88 million on patent vs £2.80 million off patent). Further cost reductions are possible as a result of the reduced cost of DNA testing, more management in general practice, and lower referral rates to specialists. For instance a dual-care model with GP management of patients supported by specialist advice when required, costs £1.89 million.
Conclusions:
The three alternative models of care are now <50% of the cost of the original estimates undertaken by NICE.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Lipids: Dietary Sources and Requirements
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

