Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

1.9K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the measurement and acoustic performance of transparent face masks and shields.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Neuropsychological and psychiatric outcomes in encephalitis: A multi-centre case-control study.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Delineating the cognitive-neural substrates of writing: a large scale behavioral and voxel based morphometry study.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Functional and emotional outcomes after transient ischemic attack: A 12-month prospective controlled cohort study.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2019
Same author

Self-construal: a cultural framework for brain function.

Current opinion in psychology·2018
Same author

A Comparison of Change Blindness in Real-World and On-Screen Viewing of Museum Artefacts.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same journal

Spatiotemporal neural dynamics of Chinese word form processing: An SEEG study.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

An in-depth investigation of face perception in developmental prosopagnosia.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Comprehension and production of argument structures by Chinese post-stroke aphasics.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Neural signatures of naming retrieval: Theta and Alpha oscillatory dynamics functionally dissociate objects, people and places.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Phonological processes and similarity constraints in consonant and vowel substitution errors: Insights from individuals with conduction aphasia.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same journal

Shortened stimulus exposure time in confrontation naming in aphasia reveals temporal processing impairments: Implications for assessment and treatment of anomia.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.0K

Temporal grouping modulates ipsilateral capture in right visual neglect.

Lara Harris1, Glyn Humphreys

  • 1a Department of Psychological Medicine , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London , UK.

Cognitive Neuropsychology
|October 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patients with right neglect exhibit ipsilesional capture, responding to left-sided distractors as targets. Temporal grouping of stimuli can mitigate this attention deficit, improving target detection.

Keywords:
Flanker paradigmIpsilesional captureRight neglectTemporal grouping

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.0K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

8.8K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • Right neglect is a common deficit following brain injury, affecting spatial attention.
  • The flanker paradigm is a standard tool for assessing visual attention and response inhibition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the attentional performance of a patient with right neglect (M.A.H.) using the flanker paradigm.
  • To explore how different manipulations of stimulus presentation affect the patient's ability to identify central targets.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed patient M.A.H.'s performance on a flanker task with unilateral and bilateral distractors.
  • Manipulated stimulus timing (onset/offset) and location markers to probe attentional capture and grouping effects.

Main Results:

  • Patient M.A.H. showed "ipsilesional capture," mistaking left-sided flankers for the central target.
  • This capture persisted even with location cues but was reduced when a right-sided flanker was present.
  • Temporal grouping (simultaneous onset/offset) of distractors improved target detection and influenced reaction time congruency effects.

Conclusions:

  • Ipsilesional capture in right neglect can be overcome by temporal grouping mechanisms, particularly when stimuli appear on both sides.
  • Findings suggest impaired response selectivity to ipsilesional stimuli in right neglect, which can be modulated by stimulus organization.