Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy01:28

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

1.4K
Capsule endoscopy, or wireless or video capsule endoscopy, is a diagnostic procedure for examining the entire gastrointestinal tract. Patients swallow a capsule about the size of a vitamin tablet. The capsule is equipped with a transmitter, a battery, an LED light source, and a color video camera to capture images throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This procedure is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, tumors, polyps, ulcers,...
1.4K
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan01:25

Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan

1.3K
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and FibroScan are valuable diagnostic tools in gastroenterology and hepatology, each with specific applications and techniques.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Machine Learning Framework to Quantify Postprandial Glucose Responses in Gestational Diabetes.

Diabetes technology and obesity medicine·2026
Same author

Digital tools for cognitive healthcare: Exploring perceptions of an everyday function app among midlife and older adults.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence and capsule endoscopy.

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas·2026
Same author

The antimicrobial gut resistome of the Wayampi reveals a shared background of antibiotic and metal resistance genes with industrialized populations, underscoring the "robust-yet-fragile" architecture of human gut microbiomes.

Microbiome·2026
Same author

Advances in endoscopy in IBD diagnostics and management.

Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2025
Same author

<i>Glycyrrhiza glabra L</i>. suppress the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer by inducing necrosis rather than apoptosis despite increasing bax level.

International journal of environmental health research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Video-rate Scanning Confocal Microscopy and Microendoscopy
14:10

Video-rate Scanning Confocal Microscopy and Microendoscopy

Published on: October 20, 2011

29.8K

Capsule endoscopy capture rate: has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second?

Ignacio Fernandez-Urien1, Cristina Carretero1, Erika Borobio1

  • 1Ignacio Fernandez-Urien, Erika Borobio, Ana Borda, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.

World Journal of Gastroenterology
|October 24, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Higher frame rates in capsule endoscopy detect more findings but increase reading time without significantly improving clinical outcomes. This suggests current frame rates are adequate for diagnostic purposes.

Keywords:
Capsule endoscopyDiagnostic accuracyFramesLandmarksLesionsSmall bowel

More Related Videos

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
05:32

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

Published on: February 21, 2025

743
Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Video-rate Scanning Confocal Microscopy and Microendoscopy
14:10

Video-rate Scanning Confocal Microscopy and Microendoscopy

Published on: October 20, 2011

29.8K
Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
05:32

Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph

Published on: February 21, 2025

743
Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture
09:04

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Devices
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Capsule endoscopy is a key tool for visualizing the gastrointestinal tract.
  • Optimizing frame rates is crucial for balancing diagnostic yield and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a new capsule prototype (SB24) operating at 4 frames-per-second (fps) against the current standard (SB2-like) at 2 fps.
  • To evaluate the impact of frame rate on the detection of anatomical landmarks and lesions, as well as clinical and therapeutic outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • One hundred patients undergoing capsule endoscopy were included.
  • Videos from the new SB24 device were analyzed and converted to SB2-like format for comparison.
  • Key metrics included landmark/lesion detection, frames per finding, and clinical/therapeutic impact.
  • Statistical analysis used Kappa index, chi-squared, and Student's t tests.

Main Results:

  • The SB24 (4 fps) detected more landmarks and lesions than SB2-like (2 fps) videos, though not statistically significant.
  • Frames per landmark/lesion were higher with SB24, but clinical and therapeutic impacts were similar between devices (Kappa = 0.954).
  • Reading time was significantly higher for SB24 when considering all images, but non-significant for small bowel images only.

Conclusions:

  • Increased frame rates in capsule endoscopy enhance the detection of anatomical landmarks and lesions.
  • Higher frame rates do not significantly improve clinical or therapeutic management outcomes.
  • The increased time investment for higher frame rates may not be justified by the marginal diagnostic gains.