Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
Published on: August 9, 2024
Intention understanding over T: a neuroimaging study on shared representations and tennis return predictions
Stephanie Cacioppo1, Frederic Fontang2, Nisa Patel3
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA ; High-Performance Electrical NeuroImaging Laboratory, Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA.
Tennis players accurately predict opponents' intentions when intentions are known beforehand. Accurate prediction involves the mirror neuron system and procedural memory, while inaccurate prediction engages lower-level processing.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Sports Science
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Understanding intention prediction in sports like tennis enhances knowledge of social cognition.
- Anticipating others' actions relies on predictive models of behavior, formed from shared representations between observer and actor.
- Accurate intention inference is challenged when actions are initiated without prior intent signaling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how tennis expertise influences the accuracy of predicting an opponent's serve intention.
- To explore the neural correlates associated with accurate versus inaccurate intention prediction in tennis players.
- To test the hypothesis that prior knowledge of an actor's intention is crucial for accurate prediction.
Main Methods:
- Recorded brain activity (EEG/fMRI) of 25 male tennis players performing a novel intention inference task.
- Utilized video clips of tennis serves in two conditions: initially intended serves and non-initially intended serves.
- Analyzed neural recruitment in relation to prediction accuracy and tennis expertise.
Main Results:
- Tennis expertise correlated with accurate intention prediction only when the server knew their intention before the ball toss.
- Accurate predictions engaged the human mirror neuron system (cortical) and the caudate nucleus (subcortical, procedural memory).
- Inaccurate predictions involved brain regions associated with low-level, bottom-up processing and self-other distinction.
Conclusions:
- Tennis expertise enhances predictive accuracy for intended actions when intentions are signaled early.
- Neural mechanisms for accurate intention prediction involve higher-order social cognition (mirror neurons) and procedural learning.
- Distinct neural pathways are recruited for accurate (top-down) versus inaccurate (bottom-up) intention inference.
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Potentiation
Long-term Potentiation
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Retrieval
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...