Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The long term ophthalmic morbidity of low birth weight children: a review.

The American orthoptic journal·2010
Same author

Ophthalmological problems associated with preterm birth.

Eye (London, England)·2007
Same author

Do infants of birth weight less than 1500 g require additional long term ophthalmic follow up?

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

Change of refractive state and eye size in children of birth weight less than 1701 g.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

Radiological review of pneumothorax.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2005
Same author

A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.

Archives of disease in childhood·2004

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K

Testing vision testing: quantifying the effect of movement on visual acuity measurement.

L P Tidbury1, A R O'Connor2

  • 11] Directorate of Orthoptics and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK [2] Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Eye (London, England)
|October 25, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Visual acuity (VA) testing shows significant patient-chart distance variations, impacting results. Minimizing movement during VA tests is crucial for improving accuracy and reliability.

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.2K
Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.2K
Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
08:27

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Visual acuity (VA) assessment variability exists between tests.
  • Inaccuracies in VA testing may stem from changes in chart-subject distance.
  • Quantifying movement during VA testing is essential for understanding score variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify changes in chart/patient separation during near and distance VA testing.
  • To analyze the relationship between VA and observed movement.
  • To identify factors influencing VA scores beyond simple movement.

Main Methods:

  • Volunteer orthoptists and subjects were filmed during VA testing.
  • Movement was quantified from video recordings.
  • VA was retested with controlled movement, comparing actual changes to theoretical predictions.

Main Results:

  • Median movements of 0.06 m towards and 0.11 m away from the chart were recorded.
  • Significant differences in VA scores were observed when movement was restricted (P<0.05).
  • Reduced test distance during near vision testing unexpectedly degraded VA.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variations in subject/chart separation can affect VA values.
  • Movement is associated with VA changes, but other factors influence near testing scores.
  • Minimizing movement during VA testing will enhance test accuracy.