Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Rethinking Phase II Clinical Trial Design in Heart Failure
Kory J Lavine1, Douglas L Mann1
1Center for Cardiovascular Research, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
Abstract:
The incidence and economic burden of heart failure continue to rise worldwide, despite implementation of a number of effective heart failure therapies. Although there have been a number phase I-II studies of potential novel heart failure therapies over the past decade, none of these new compounds have been successful in phase III clinical trials. While there are likely a number of reasons for this failure, one of the problems that has become increasingly apparent is the inability of phase II trials to correctly identify novel therapies that will be successful in phase III clinical trials. In the following review, we will discuss the some of the problems inherent with current phase II heart failure clinical trials, as well as discuss possible ways to rethink phase II development of new therapies for heart failure.
Insights
Heart failure therapies face challenges in clinical trials. Current phase II trials struggle to predict success in phase III, necessitating a rethink of heart failure drug development.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Heart failure incidence and economic burden are increasing globally.
- Despite effective therapies, novel treatments fail in late-stage clinical trials.
- Previous phase I-II studies have not translated into successful phase III outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify challenges in current phase II heart failure clinical trials.
- To propose alternative strategies for phase II development of heart failure therapies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on phase I-II and phase III clinical trials for heart failure therapies.
- Analysis of reasons for the failure of novel compounds in phase III trials.
Main Results:
- Phase II trials often fail to accurately predict the efficacy of novel heart failure therapies in phase III.
- Inherent limitations in current phase II trial designs contribute to high failure rates.
Conclusions:
- Rethinking phase II trial design is crucial for successful heart failure drug development.
- Improved methodologies in phase II trials may enhance the identification of effective heart failure therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Clinical Trials: Overview
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

