Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.0K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

359
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
359
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.1K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.8K
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

1.0K
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
1.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of uroflowmetry results in community-dwelling adult males: Results of 24 years of Korean population-based screening data.

Investigative and clinical urology·2026
Same author

Decomposition of longitudinal disparities: an application to the fetal growth-singletons study.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

It's Not Too Late: Physical and Social Activity Slow Cognitive Decline in Those Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society·2025
Same author

Nonparametric predictive model for sparse and irregular longitudinal data.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

Complications and Technical Consideration of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis of 4033 Patients.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2023
Same author

Predictive generalized varying-coefficient longitudinal model.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same journal

A Bayesian method for analyzing combinations of continuous, ordinal, and nominal categorical data with missing values.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical structure-guided high-dimensional multi-view clustering.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2026
Same journal

Quadratic inference with dense functional responses.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2025
Same journal

Graph-constrained Analysis for Multivariate Functional Data.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2025
Same journal

From multivariate to functional data analysis: fundamentals, recent developments, and emerging areas.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2024
Same journal

Modeling the Cholesky factors of covariance matrices of multivariate longitudinal data.

Journal of multivariate analysis·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K

Specification test for Markov models with measurement errors.

Seonjin Kim1, Zhibiao Zhao2

  • 1Miami University.

Journal of Multivariate Analysis
|October 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for specification testing in Markov models using contaminated observations. It assesses if the underlying Markov chain fits a parametric model by comparing regression function estimates.

Keywords:
Markov modelMeasurement errorsNonparametric estimationSimultaneous confidence bandSpecification testingTime series

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Time Series Analysis
  • Stochastic Processes

Background:

  • Specification testing typically requires direct observations, limiting its application.
  • Markov models are widely used but often studied with ideal data.
  • Contaminated observations introduce complexities in analyzing underlying model dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for specification testing of Markov models with contaminated observations.
  • To address the challenge of analyzing unobservable Markov chains from indirect data.
  • To evaluate the fit of parametric models to Markov chains under observation noise.

Main Methods:

  • Proposing a deviation measure between nonparametric and parametric estimates of conditional regression functions.
  • Constructing a nonparametric simultaneous confidence band for these functions.
  • Testing the hypothesis by checking if the parametric estimate falls within the confidence band.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively distinguishes between correctly and incorrectly specified parametric models.
  • The confidence band provides a robust framework for hypothesis testing with contaminated data.
  • The deviation measure quantifies the discrepancy introduced by model misspecification and observation contamination.

Conclusions:

  • Specification testing for Markov models is feasible even with contaminated observations.
  • The developed technique offers a practical approach for validating parametric assumptions in complex systems.
  • This work extends the applicability of specification testing to more realistic, noisy data scenarios.