Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...

Censoring Survival Data

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diet alters age-related remodeling of aortic collagen in mice susceptible to atherosclerosis.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2020

Same author

Transforming Growth Factor Beta3 is Required for Cardiovascular Development.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2020

Same author

Both diet and Helicobacter pylori infection contribute to atherosclerosis in pre- and postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys.

PloS one·2019

Same author

Loss of Function of Phosphodiesterase 11A4 Shows that Recent and Remote Long-Term Memories Can Be Uncoupled.

Current biology : CB·2019

Same author

Axonal G3BP1 stress granule protein limits axonal mRNA translation and nerve regeneration.

Nature communications·2018

Same author

Treatment effect on ordinal functional outcome using piecewise multistate Markov model with unobservable baseline: an application to the modified Rankin scale.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2018

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Parametric Estimation in a Recurrent Competing Risks Model.

Laura L Taylor¹, Edsel A Peña²

¹Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Elon University, Elon.

JIRSS : Journal of the Iranian Statistical Society

|October 28, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a resource-efficient recurrent competing risks model (RCRM) for analyzing system failures. The model efficiently estimates failure time distributions using repair strategies and warranty data, demonstrating significant efficiency gains.

Keywords:

Competing risks martingales perfect and partial repairs recurrent events repairable systems survival analysis

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Reliability Engineering
Survival Analysis
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Competing risks analysis is crucial for understanding system failures.
Traditional methods can be resource-intensive.
Observing recurrences offers efficiency gains.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a resource-efficient approach for analyzing competing risks.
To introduce the recurrent competing risks model (RCRM).
To develop estimators for system lifetime and marginal distributions under different repair strategies.

Main Methods:

Developed the recurrent competing risks model (RCRM).
Derived maximum likelihood estimators for marginal and system lifetime distributions.
Investigated estimators under perfect and partial repair strategies.
Obtained consistency and asymptotic properties of estimators.

Main Results:

The RCRM provides efficient inferences on failure time distributions.
Maximum likelihood estimators were derived and their properties established.
The model was applied to car warranty failure data.
Simulation studies confirmed small sample properties and efficiency gains.

Conclusions:

The RCRM offers a statistically sound and efficient method for competing risks analysis.
The developed estimators are consistent and asymptotically reliable.
The approach is practical, as demonstrated by its application to real-world warranty data.