Related Experiment Videos

Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation: an ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement.

William O Roberts1, Herbert Löllgen, Gordon O Matheson

  • 1*Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Phalen Village Family Medicine Clinic, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota; †Hon.Pres.German Fed.Sports Medicine, Bermesgasse, Remscheid, Germany; ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; §Department of Economics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana; ¶Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; **University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ††The Goldberg Center for Community Pediatric Health, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia; ‡‡University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; §§Institute of Sports Medicine and Science, Rome, Italy; ¶¶FIMS, EFSMA, Kiewitstraat, Hasselt, Belgium; ‖‖Department of Sports and Physiological Performance, Centre for Sports Science and University Sports, of the University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and ***University of Rome "Foro Italico," Piazza Lauro de Bosis, Roma.

Summary

The preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) lacks standardization, impacting its implementation. An electronic PPE system could improve data collection and streamline the process for athletes and healthcare providers.

Related Concept Videos