Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

5.3K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.3K
Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions01:12

Loss of Tumor Suppressor Gene Functions

4.8K
Tumor suppressor genes are normal genes that can slow down cell division, repair DNA mistakes, or program the cells for apoptosis in case of irreparable damage. Hence, they play an essential role in preventing the proliferation of damaged cells.
When the tumor suppressor genes develop mutations or are lost, cells start growing out of control, leading to cancer. However, a single functional copy of the tumor suppressor gene is enough for the cells to maintain their normal functions and cell...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Genomic Landscape of MYC, MYCL, and MYCN Amplified Solid Tumors.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Landscape of genetic alterations affecting cancer genes in primary and advanced malignant phyllodes tumours.

Histopathology·2026
Same author

Very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in treatment-naïve women with endometrial cancer and overweight: a randomized feasibility study.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Prognostic comparison of the FIGO 2009 and 2023 endometrial cancer staging systems: a large, single-institution retrospective cohort study.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2026
Same author

Germline Pathogenic Variants in Homologous Recombination Pathway Genes Are Frequent in Pancreatobiliary Ampullary Carcinoma.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Characterizing therapeutic target antigen expression in anaplastic carcinoma of the ovary.

Gynecologic oncology reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

12.8K

Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Luciano G Martelotto1, Charlotte Ky Ng, Maria R De Filippo

  • 1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Genome Biology
|October 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting cancer-causing mutations requires robust methods. This study compared 15 mutation effect prediction algorithms, finding that combining them modestly improves accuracy and significantly enhances the ability to rule out neutral mutations.

More Related Videos

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

22.2K
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
08:46

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

12.8K
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

22.2K
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Massively parallel sequencing identifies numerous cancer mutations, necessitating methods to pinpoint pathogenic variants.
  • Developing reliable tools is crucial for prioritizing mutations for experimental and clinical investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance and agreement of 15 mutation effect prediction algorithms.
  • To investigate if combining prediction algorithms improves functional effect predictions for cancer mutations.

Main Methods:

  • Collected single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in 15 cancer genes with functional or hereditary disease evidence.
  • Classified SNVs as non-neutral (n=849) or neutral (n=140) based on protein function impact.
  • Evaluated the performance of 15 mutation effect prediction algorithms using these SNVs.

Main Results:

  • Algorithm accuracy varied significantly, with consistent positive predictive values but substantial differences in negative predictive values.
  • Cancer-specific predictors showed high agreement, while non-cancer-specific predictors had low to moderate agreement.
  • Combining predictors modestly improved overall accuracy and significantly enhanced negative predictive values.

Conclusions:

  • Mutation effect predictor performance is not uniform; no single algorithm sufficiently predicts SNVs for clinical or experimental follow-up.
  • Combining algorithms can aggregate complementary information, potentially improving the negative predictive value for identifying neutral mutations.