Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Randomized Placebo-Controlled EPPIC Trials of AST-120 in CKD
Gerald Schulman1, Tomas Berl2, Gerald J Beck3
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; gerald.schulman@vanderbilt.edu.
AST-120, an oral carbon adsorbent, did not slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with moderate to severe disease. Clinical trials showed no significant difference in time to dialysis, transplantation, or creatinine doubling between AST-120 and placebo groups.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) leads to uremic toxin accumulation, worsening disease progression and morbidity.
- AST-120, an oral spherical carbon adsorbent, aims to reduce systemic toxin absorption via gastrointestinal sequestration.
- The potential benefit of AST-120 in slowing CKD progression warrants investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of AST-120, when added to standard therapy, in slowing the progression of moderate to severe CKD.
- To assess the impact of AST-120 on key composite endpoints including dialysis initiation, kidney transplantation, and serum creatinine doubling.
Main Methods:
- Multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (EPPIC-1 and EPPIC-2) involving 2035 adult patients with moderate to severe CKD.
- Patients received either AST-120 (9 g/d) or a placebo, alongside standard CKD therapy.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of dialysis initiation, kidney transplantation, or doubling of serum creatinine, with trials continuing until 291 primary endpoints accrued per trial.
Main Results:
- The time to the primary composite endpoint was statistically similar between the AST-120 and placebo groups in both EPPIC-1 (HR, 1.03; P=0.78) and EPPIC-2 (HR, 0.91; P=0.37).
- A pooled analysis of both trials confirmed no significant difference in disease progression between the treatment arms.
- Actual median times to primary endpoints were longer than anticipated, suggesting a more gradual disease progression in the study populations than expected.
Conclusions:
- Adding AST-120 to standard therapy did not demonstrate a significant benefit in slowing the progression of moderate to severe CKD in the evaluated patient populations.
- The study data do not support the use of AST-120 for delaying key CKD progression events like dialysis or transplantation.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative therapeutic strategies for managing CKD progression.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

