Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
10.9K
Cooperation and control in multiplayer social dilemmas
Christian Hilbe1, Bin Wu2, Arne Traulsen2
1Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Departments of Mathematics and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and Department of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany hilbe@fas.harvard.edu.
Summary
New zero-determinant strategies allow individuals to exert significant control in large group social dilemmas. These strategies, including fair, extortionate, and generous types, sustain cooperation through coordination and individual influence.
Area of Science:
- Game Theory
- Social Dilemmas
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Direct reciprocity and conditional cooperation are key to preventing free riding in social dilemmas.
- These mechanisms often fail in large groups due to limited individual influence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a theory for zero-determinant strategies in iterated multiplayer social dilemmas.
- To explore strategies that sustain cooperation and enhance individual control in large groups.
Main Methods:
- Developed a mathematical framework for zero-determinant strategies in multiplayer settings.
- Identified and analyzed subclasses: fair, extortionate, and generous strategies.
- Explored coordination models to enhance strategic options.
Main Results:
- Introduced generalized zero-determinant strategies applicable to any number of players.
- Demonstrated strategies like generalized Tit-for-Tat and Win-Stay Lose-Shift sustain cooperation.
- Showcased how coordination amplifies individual strategic effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Zero-determinant strategies offer significant individual control in large-scale social dilemmas.
- Coordination is crucial for maximizing strategic options and success in group interactions.
- Individual influence and strategic coordination are vital for overcoming challenges in large groups.
Related Concept Videos
04:49Robbers Cave
13.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
13.5K
00:52Social Proof
24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
336
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
336
01:37Social Loafing
29.2K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
29.2K
02:12Relationship Formation
28.4K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
28.4K
01:41Social Traps
20.5K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
20.5K