Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Health literacy and nurses' communication with type 2 diabetes patients in primary care settings
Fatima Al Sayah1, Beverly Williams, Jenelle L Pederson
1Fatima Al Sayah, PhD, is Research Associate, Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Beverly Williams, PhD, is Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Jenelle L. Pederson, BA, is Research Assistant, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada. Sumit R. Majumdar, MD, is Professor, Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD, is Professor, Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Background:
The use of the interactive communication loop has been recommended as an effective method to enhance patient understanding and recall of information.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to examine the application of interactive communication loops, use of jargon, and the impact of health literacy (HL) when nurses provide education and counseling to patients with type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting in Alberta, Canada.
Methods:
Encounters between nurses and patients with type 2 diabetes were audio recorded, and a patient survey including a HL measure was administered. Topics within each interaction were coded based on five key components of the communication loop and categories of jargon.
Results:
Nine nurses participated in this study, and encounters with 36 patients were recorded. A complete communication loop was noted in only 11% of the encounters. Clarifying health information was the most commonly applied component (58% often used), followed by repeating health information (33% often used). Checking for understanding was the least applied (81% never used), followed by asking for understanding (42% never used). Medical jargon and mismatched language were often used in 17% and 25% of the encounters, respectively. Patients' HL did not materially affect patterns of communication in terms of using communication loops; however, nurses used less jargon and mismatched words with patients with inadequate HL.
Discussion:
The overuse of medical jargon accompanied with underuse of communication loop components jeopardizes patients' comprehension and retention of information that they need to know to properly self-manage their diabetes. Nurses need to develop more effective ways to communicate concepts critical to chronic diabetes self-care education and management.
Related Concept Videos
Health Literacy
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
