Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
Published on: May 27, 2021
Synergic effect between 5‑fluorouracil and celecoxib on hypoxic gastric cancer cells
Xiao-Qian Zhang1, Xiu-E Sun2, Wen-Dong Liu3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China.
Abstract:
5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU) is commonly used in the treatment of gastric cancer; however, resistance to this drug occurs under hypoxic conditions. Celecoxib may be used to reverse this resistance. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the inhibitory effects and mechanisms of 5‑FU and celecoxib on the gastric cancer cell line SGC7901 under hypoxic conditions. SGC7901 cells were divided into four groups: Hypoxic control group, 5‑FU group, celecoxib group and 5‑FU/celecoxib combination group. Following treatment, the inhibition rates of cells were determined using an MTT assay. Protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of hypoxia‑inducible factor 2α (HIF‑2α), adenosine triphosphate‑binding cassette sub‑family G member 2 (ABCG2) and octamer binding protein 4 (Oct‑4) were determined using immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) and western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that the 5‑FU/celecoxib combination group had a significantly higher inhibition rate than the individually treated 5‑FU and celecoxib groups (P<0.05); inhibition rates were 66.09, 52.61 and 46.1%, respectively. mRNA and protein expression levels of HIF‑2α, ABCG2 and Oct‑4 were significantly lower in the celecoxib and 5‑FU/celecoxib combination groups (P<0.01) compared with those of the hypoxia control and 5‑FU groups. The 5‑FU group demonstrated the highest levels of the respective mRNA and proteins. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that celecoxib had anti‑tumor effects, as it was shown to inhibit tumor cell growth via the inhibition of HIF‑2α, ABCG2 and Oct‑4. The 5‑FU/celecoxib combination had a synergic effect on tumor growth inhibition. This therefore suggested that inhibition of HIF‑2α, ABCG2 and Oct‑4 may be a potential method of reducing chemotherapy resistance and enhancing the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...

