Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone-anchored prostheses for transtibial amputation: A systematic review of outcomes, complications, and cost-effectiveness.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Optimizing human-in-the-loop training: Real-time personalized task scheduling via model predictive control.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

The association of objective gait measures with patient-reported outcome measures and physical performance following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

The Knee·2026
Same author

The impact of wrist flexion on task performance and compensatory movements in transradial prosthesis users.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Toward personalized human-in-the-loop training: Real-time estimation of individual motor learning dynamics using the dual-rate model.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Differential modulation of trunk muscle activation using thoracic epidural spinal stimulation.

Journal of neural engineering·2025
Same journal

Presentation Highlights: International service delivery.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2023
Same journal

Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans with back pain: Characteristics and predictors of compensation and pension award.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2021
Same journal

Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: A prospective study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2020
Same journal

Tongue-controlled robotic rehabilitation: A feasibility study in people with stroke.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
Same journal

Utility of a multimodal neurophysiologic assessment tool in distinguishing between individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
Same journal

Efficacy of extremely low-frequency magnetic field in fibromyalgia pain: A pilot study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography
04:06

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

1.2K

Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture.

Jacqueline S Hebert1, Justin Lewicke, Thomas R Williams

  • 1Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
|October 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study establishes normative upper-limb motion data using a modified Box and Blocks (BB) test. Findings show consistent kinematic trajectories for assessing upper-limb function and prosthetic performance.

Keywords:
Box and Blocks testbiomechanicskinematicslimb functionmotionmotion captureoutcome measurespatient outcome assessmentprosthetic performanceupper limb

More Related Videos

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

10.6K
An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
07:25

An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor

Published on: February 12, 2018

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography
04:06

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

1.2K
Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

10.6K
An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor
07:25

An Objective and Child-friendly Assessment of Arm Function by Using a 3-D Sensor

Published on: February 12, 2018

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Kinesiology
  • Rehabilitation Science

Background:

  • Motion analysis is crucial for evaluating upper-limb function.
  • Previous research utilized a modified Box and Blocks (BB) test with motion capture for prosthetic assessment.
  • Establishing normative kinematic data is essential for interpreting clinical measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normative kinematic data for a modified Box and Blocks (BB) test in nondisabled individuals.
  • To analyze upper-limb and trunk motion during the BB test in different postures.
  • To provide a baseline for assessing upper-limb impairments and intervention effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Collected motion capture data from 16 nondisabled participants performing a modified BB test.
  • Analyzed four distinct motions of the BB test, assessing both upper-limb and trunk kinematics.
  • Compared performance between right and left arms, and between standing and seated positions using a nonparametric Friedman test.

Main Results:

  • No significant kinematic differences were observed between right and left-hand performance, except for task completion time.
  • Slight, significant differences in trunk and hand displacement were noted between standing and seated positions.
  • Kinematic trajectories demonstrated high consistency across participants and conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The modified BB test with motion capture yields consistent kinematic data in nondisabled individuals.
  • Normative kinematic trajectories can be defined for this task, aiding in the assessment of upper-limb function.
  • This methodology can enhance understanding of movement in upper-limb impairment and evaluate intervention efficacy.