Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Documentation of quality control and operator training at point-of-care testing: a College of American Pathologists
Kathryn S Dyhdalo1, Peter J Howanitz, David S Wilkinson
1From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Dyhdalo); the Department of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York (Dr Howanitz); the Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (Dr Wilkinson); the Department of Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ms Souers); and the Department of Pathology, Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Jones).
Context:
Operator training, quality control, and proper follow-up for out-of-range quality control (QC) events are crucial steps that must be adequately performed and documented to ensure excellent patient care and regulatory compliance.
Objective:
To examine point-of-care testing (POCT) personnel training and QC documentation/compliance.
Design:
Participants in a POCT documentation study of the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program collected data retrospectively for glucose and urine dipstick testing regarding test operators, operator competency assessment, and QC documentation. Documentation was assessed for participant adherence to 4 quality indicators: (1) whether test operator training was up to date, (2) whether the test operator names were noted in the test records, (3) whether QC was performed, and (4) whether out-of-range QC events were followed up. Data were analyzed for associations with institutional demographic and practice variables.
Results:
The institutional median number of POCT personnel was 648 for blood glucose and 76 for urine dipstick testing, with a median number of 105 948 glucose tests and 9113 urine tests performed. Ninety-four percent (3830 of 4074) of the test operators completed training or competency assessment within the prior 12 months, 96.8% (21 603 of 22 317) of the test records documented the operator, and 95.7% (19 632 of 20 514) of the expected QC events (per institutional regulations) were documented. Approximately 3% (659 of 20 514) of the QC events were outside the designated range (an average of 6 out-of-range QC events were identified per institution [n = 106]). Of the out-of-range QC events, 92.6% (610 of 659) had documentation of appropriate follow-up. Most laboratories (176 of 179; 98.3%) violated specimen requirements by storing POCT urine specimens for less than 24 hours.
Conclusions:
There was greater than 90% compliance for POCT documentation and nearly 96% of expected QC events were properly documented.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...

