Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures
Robert Thorsness1, James Iannuzzi1, Katia Noyes1
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to use a nationally representative database to determine the differences in 30-day outcomes based on procedure type for management of proximal humerus fractures including complications, readmission, operative time, and length of stay. Further, we sought to determine patient characteristics and perioperative factors associated with poor outcomes.
Design/Setting:
This was a retrospective study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The NSQIP comprises a clinical database with systematic patient tracking at multiple hospitals across the United States.
Patients:
A total of 413 patients with proximal humerus fractures managed surgically were included.
Intervention:
Of 413 patients, 330 underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 83 underwent hemiarthroplasty.
Main Outcomes/Measurements:
The primary end points included major and minor complications, operative time, rate of return to the operating room, and length of stay.
Results:
Compared to the hemiarthroplasty cohort, patients in the ORIF cohort were significantly younger (64.2; 17-90 and 69.3; 20-90, respectively, P = .007) and were significantly less likely to be of functionally dependent status (17.5% and 27.7%, P = .036). Compared to the hemiarthroplasty cohort, the ORIF cohort demonstrated fewer postoperative bleeding complications (2.4% and 8.4%, respectively, P = .016) and shorter operative times (115 vs 131 minutes, P = .017). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to complications, reoperation rates, or length of hospital stay. On multivariable analysis, hemiarthroplasty demonstrated increased risk of postoperative bleeding compared to ORIF (odds ratio = 7.06, confidence interval: 2.06-24.24; P = .002) as well as increased operative time (P = .01).
Conclusions:
Patients who undergo hemiarthroplasty for management of proximal humerus fractures are significantly older and often functionally dependent. When compared to ORIF, hemiarthroplasty is associated with longer operative times and greater risk of bleeding complications.
More Related Videos
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus