Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

7.3K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
7.3K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.3K
2.3K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

1.8K
1.8K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

373
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
373
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

999
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
999

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Binary colloidal mixtures in near-critical binary solvents.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Urinary tract infections after benign cystectomy: Incidence, risk factors, pathogens, and resistance patterns.

Investigative and clinical urology·2026
Same author

The atomic structure of human dystrophin spectrin-like repeat 24.

Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications·2026
Same author

Using test particle sum rules to improve approximations in classical density functional theory: White-Bear and White-Bear mark II versions of the Lutsko functional.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Identifying small molecule impurities in electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibres using ultra-selective NMR.

Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications·2026
Same author

Beyond species means - the intraspecific contribution to global wood density variation.

The New phytologist·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Actor and analyst: a response to Coopmans and Button.

Harry Collins, Robert Evans

    Social Studies of Science
    |November 4, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study challenges Coopmans and Button's critique of expertise analysis by refuting the actor-analyst distinction and questioning the exclusion of taxonomies in understanding expert work and skills.

    Area of Science:

    • Sociology of knowledge
    • Science and technology studies

    Background:

    • Critiques of expertise analysis often rely on strict distinctions between actors and analysts.
    • The role of taxonomies and the relationship between commonsense and specialist skills in expertise are debated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critique Coopmans and Button's analysis of expertise.
    • To challenge the maintained distinction between actors and analysts in research.
    • To question the exclusion of taxonomies in the study of expertise.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of existing critiques.
    • Examination of the relationship between commonsense and specialist skills.
    • Analysis of the utility and impact of analysts' categories.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The actor-analyst distinction is not sustainable in the analysis of expertise.
    • Excluding taxonomies from expertise analysis is inconsistent with descriptions of expert work.
    • Analysts' categories can offer superior understanding and influence actors' worlds.

    Conclusions:

    • The critique by Coopmans and Button is logically flawed.
    • Taxonomies are valuable tools for analyzing expertise.
    • Ethnomethodological approaches should reconsider the restrictive use of analysts' categories.