Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of liver transplantation in critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit: a retrospective study.

Clinical transplantation and research·2026
Same author

Quantifying long-term outcomes and risks for living liver donors: a review of the current global experience.

Annals of hepatology·2026
Same author

Therapeutic Targeting of miR-21 Restores SASH1 and Sensitizes HBV-HCC to Sorafenib.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Long-Term Renal Outcomes Following Left Renal Vein Ligation Versus Direct Splenorenal Shunt Ligation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A 10-Year Single-Center Study.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2026
Same author

Survival and Recurrence in Liver Transplant Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Annals of transplantation·2026
Same author

Living-donor liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal-vein tumor thrombosis.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.8K

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center.

Young-Dong Yu1, Ki-Hun Kim, Dong-Hwan Jung

  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Langenbeck'S Archives of Surgery
|November 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Robotic liver resection offers a safe and feasible minimally invasive surgical option comparable to laparoscopic liver surgery in perioperative outcomes. Further cost reduction and tool refinement could increase robotic surgery adoption.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
03:33

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.5K
Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:23

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: April 19, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
03:33

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.5K
Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:23

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: April 19, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Robotic surgery offers advantages for minimally invasive procedures.
  • Its application in liver surgery is expanding.
  • This study compares robotic and laparoscopic liver resection outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver surgery.
  • To evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic liver resection.
  • To identify factors influencing clinical application.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective comparison of 206 patients undergoing liver surgery (July 2007-October 2011).
  • Included patients who underwent left hemihepatectomy or left lateral sectionectomy.
  • Compared robotic (n=13) and laparoscopic (n=17) liver resection groups.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in operative time, blood loss, liver function, complications, or hospital stay.
  • Groups were similar in age, gender, tumor type, and size.
  • Medical cost was higher in the robotic group.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic liver resection is a safe and feasible option for experienced surgeons.
  • Sophisticated advantages of robotic systems noted.
  • Reduced medical cost and improved tools could enhance clinical application.