Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Steerable Sheaths That Turn Endoscopes into Robotic Platforms for Colon Interventions.

Journal of medical devices·2026
Same author

Prevention of Recurrent Nephrolithiasis in Adults and Children : A Systematic Review.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

From Lichtleiter to Laser: A 200-Year Odyssey of Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Urology·2026
Same author

Toward Image-Guided, Robot-Assisted Focal Prostate Resection: Do Enhanced Dexterity and Visualization Improve Performance?

Journal of medical robotics research·2026
Same author

Robotic Transurethral Vesicourethral Anastomosis after Radical Prostatectomy in Validated Models.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same author

Automated Characterization of Pyelocalyceal Anatomy Using CT Urograms to Aid in Management of Kidney Stones.

Computer assisted and robotic endoscopy and clinical image-based procedures : 4th International Workshop, CARE 2017, and 6th International Workshop, CLIP 2017, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2017 Quebec City, QC, Canada, September 14, ...·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
03:57

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis

Published on: July 8, 2025

444

Microlaparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in transperitoneal pyeloplasty.

Aaron D Benson1, Trisha M Juliano, Davis P Viprakasit

  • 1Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, Tennessee.

Journal of Endourology
|November 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Microlaparoscopic pyeloplasty (MLP) offers comparable success rates to conventional laparoscopy (CLP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. This study shows MLP is safe, feasible, and provides better cosmetic outcomes.

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
08:57

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: June 17, 2018

16.8K
Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
06:39

Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Published on: November 22, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
03:57

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis

Published on: July 8, 2025

444
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
08:57

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: June 17, 2018

16.8K
Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
06:39

Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Published on: November 22, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
  • Microlaparoscopic (MLP) instruments (<3 mm) are now suitable for complex surgical tasks.
  • This study compares MLP with conventional laparoscopy (CLP) for transperitoneal pyeloplasty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microlaparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
  • To assess outcomes including operative time, length of stay, complication rates, and success rates.
  • To compare the cosmetic results of MLP and CLP.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of hybrid MLP (5-mm camera, 1.9- or 3-mm instruments) and CLP procedures.
  • Comparison of patient demographics, operative variables, and outcomes using statistical tests (Student t test, Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact).
  • Evaluation of success rates based on follow-up renal scan parameters.

Main Results:

  • 19 MLP and 27 CLP procedures were analyzed.
  • No significant differences were found in operative time, length of stay, complication rates, or success rates (89.5% MLP vs. 88.9% CLP).
  • MLP patients were younger on average, and MLP offered subjectively superior cosmesis.

Conclusions:

  • Transperitoneal pyeloplasty using microlaparoscopy is safe and feasible.
  • MLP demonstrates comparable outcomes to CLP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
  • Microlaparoscopy offers potential advantages in cosmesis and represents an advancement in minimally invasive urological surgery.