Reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Japanese preschool children aged 4-6 years
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Yuriko Doi1, Kaneyoshi Ishihara, Makoto Uchiyama
1Area on Epidemiological Research, National Institute of Public Health.
Insights
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) 3-4 shows good reliability for total difficulties and prosocial behavior in Japanese preschoolers. Other scales demonstrate acceptable to poor reliability, suggesting cautious use.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Psychometric Evaluation
Background:
- The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely utilized brief behavioral screening tool.
- The SDQ 3-4 is specifically designed for assessing behavioral and emotional issues in young children.
- Reliability studies are crucial for validating screening tools in diverse populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the SDQ 3-4.
- To assess the psychometric properties of the SDQ 3-4 in Japanese preschool children.
- To determine the suitability of the SDQ 3-4 for behavioral screening in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Administered the SDQ 3-4 to 754 parents of Japanese preschool children (ages 4-6).
- Collected data at two time points over a two-week interval to assess test-retest reliability.
- Utilized Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability.
Main Results:
- Internal consistency was good for total difficulties (α=0.74) and prosocial behavior (α=0.70).
- Internal consistency was acceptable for emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and hyperactivity (α=0.61-0.66), but poor for peer problems (α=0.45).
- Test-retest reliability was good (r=0.73-0.82) for most scales, with peer problems showing lower reliability (r=0.58).
Conclusions:
- The SDQ 3-4 demonstrates satisfactory reliability for total difficulties and prosocial behavior scales in Japanese preschoolers.
- Reliability is acceptable for emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and hyperactivity scales.
- The peer problems scale requires cautious interpretation due to lower reliability in this population.
Background:
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been widely used as a brief behavioral screening. The aim of this study was to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the 3- to 4-year-old version of the SDQ (SDQ 3-4) in Japanese preschool children.
Methods:
The SDQ 3-4 was administered to 754 parents who had 4- to 6-year-old children attending kindergartens or childcare centers in Wako City, Japan, at 2 different times (Time 1 and Time 2) over a 2-week interval between June and July 2012. Cronbach's α and correlation coefficients were used to examine internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively.
Results:
Of 393 parents who returned their responses at Time 1 (response rate 52.1%), 383 were used for analysis after excluding 10 responses with missing data. Their children's mean age was 4.7 (standard deviation 0.7) years. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) was good for the total difficulties score (0.74) and the prosocial behavior scale (0.70). However, it was slightly worse for the emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and hyperactivity scales (0.61-0.66) and poor for the peer problems scale (0.45). Of the 383 included respondents at Time 1, 211 parents returned their responses at Time 2 (response rate: 55.1%). Test-retest reliability (correlation coefficients) was good (0.73-0.82), except for the peer problems scale (0.58).
Conclusions:
The results support the reliability of the SDQ 3-4 being satisfactory for the total difficulties score and prosocial behavior scale and being acceptable for the emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and hyperactivity scales in Japanese preschool children aged 4-6 years.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality

