Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

1.0K
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
1.0K
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

4.3K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
4.3K
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

1.4K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do infants have a sense of beauty? A study using kinetic dot displays.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

What can face preference in newborns tell us about their face representation? Contrasting learned familiarity with inherent bias accounts.

Child development·2026
Same author

Impact of Surgical Masks on Newborns' Spontaneous Face Processing Skills.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2026
Same author

What smartphones change about writing: the impact of word suggestions on orthographic processing.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2025
Same author

Covering the eyes or mouth of a speaker does not prevent word learning in typically developing infants.

Developmental psychology·2025
Same author

Infants' Preference for ID Speech in Face and Voice Extends to a Non-Native Language.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.1K

Bilingualism affects audiovisual phoneme identification.

Sabine Burfin1, Olivier Pascalis1, Elisa Ruiz Tada2

  • 1LPNC (CNRS UMR 5105) - Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble, France.

Frontiers in Psychology
|November 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Adults lose the ability to distinguish non-native speech sounds as they learn a language. This study shows that while visual cues help both bilinguals and monolinguals identify foreign phonemes, monolinguals perform better, suggesting different visual processing strategies.

Keywords:
audiovisual speechbilingualsmonolingualsphonological deafness

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

236

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

1.1K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

236

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Audiovisual Speech Perception
  • Phonetics

Background:

  • Perceptual narrowing impacts phoneme identification, reducing the ability to distinguish non-native sounds.
  • Linguistic experience, particularly early bilingualism, shapes phonological inventories and perception.
  • Understanding how visual cues influence non-native phoneme perception is crucial for speech processing research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of linguistic experience on visual processes in non-native phoneme identification.
  • To compare audiovisual and audio-only speech perception in monolingual and bilingual adults for a non-native phoneme contrast.
  • To explore differences in visual speech decoding strategies between monolinguals and bilinguals.

Main Methods:

  • An ABX phoneme identification task was administered to adult monolingual and bilingual participants.
  • A Bengali dental-retroflex phoneme contrast, absent in participants' native languages, was used.
  • Stimuli were presented in both audiovisual (AV) and audio-only (A) conditions.

Main Results:

  • In audio-only conditions, both groups struggled with the non-native retroflex phoneme, showing phonological 'deafness'.
  • Audiovisual presentation enabled both groups to identify the non-native phonemes, overcoming audio limitations.
  • Monolinguals demonstrated higher accuracy and faster response times than bilinguals in the audiovisual condition.

Conclusions:

  • Visual speech cues can mitigate phonological deafness for non-native phonemes in both monolinguals and bilinguals.
  • Monolinguals and bilinguals may employ distinct cognitive processes for decoding visual speech.
  • Linguistic background significantly influences the integration of auditory and visual information in speech perception.