Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

9.5K
The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
9.5K
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

5.2K
The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at...
5.2K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.9K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transformer brain encoders explain human high-level visual responses.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

In Silico Mapping of Visual Categorical Selectivity Across the Whole Brain.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

Decentralized community-integrated research sites drive higher randomization rates: insights from a large-scale neurodegenerative disease trial.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Experientially-grounded and distributional semantic vectors uncover dissociable representations of conceptual categories.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2025
Same author

Generative adversarial collaborations: a new model of scientific discourse.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2024
Same author

The topology and geometry of neural representations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.4K

Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation.

Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi1, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte1

  • 1Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Plos Computational Biology
|November 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Computational models of visual object recognition are improving but do not fully explain the human inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Supervised deep learning models best account for IT representations, especially when combined with specific feature weighting.

More Related Videos

Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping
13:12

Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping

Published on: August 12, 2019

46.8K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.4K
Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping
13:12

Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping

Published on: August 12, 2019

46.8K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computer Vision
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • The inferior temporal (IT) cortex is crucial for visual object recognition in primates.
  • Current computational models of object vision do not fully replicate human performance or internal representations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess how well various computational models explain the representational geometry of the primate IT cortex.
  • To identify key features of computational models that best account for IT representations.

Main Methods:

  • Compared representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) from 37 computational models with human and monkey IT RDMs.
  • Evaluated models including HMAX, VisNet, SIFT, GIST, and deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).
  • Used fMRI in humans and cell recordings in monkeys for IT data, with stimuli not used in model training.

Main Results:

  • Better performing models showed greater similarity to IT representations, particularly in categorical clustering and within-category dissimilarities.
  • Unsupervised models poorly explained the categorical clustering observed in IT.
  • A supervised deep CNN achieved the highest performance and best explained IT data, though not fully.

Conclusions:

  • Explaining IT representations necessitates computational features trained via supervised learning.
  • Emphasizing behaviorally relevant categorical divisions through supervised training is key for IT representation.
  • Combining supervised deep CNN features with specific linear combinations fully explained the IT data.