Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

13.0K
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
13.0K
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures03:17

Inheritance of Chromatin Structures

8.0K
Epigenetics is the study of inherited changes in a cell's phenotype without changing the DNA sequences. It provides a form of memory for the differential gene expression pattern to maintain cell lineage, position-effect variegation, dosage compensation, and maintenance of chromatin structures such as telomeres and centromeres. For example, the structure and location of the centromere on chromosomes are epigenetically inherited. Its functionality is not dictated or ensured by the underlying...
8.0K
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications02:25

Spreading of Chromatin Modifications

10.1K
The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer...
10.1K
Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells01:32

Chromatin Modification in iPS Cells

2.3K
Chromatin modification alters gene expression; therefore, scientists can add histone-modifying enzymes, histone variants, and chromatin remodeling complexes to somatic cells to aid reprogramming into pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.
Compact chromatin makes reprogramming difficult. Enzymes, such as histone demethylases and acetyltransferases, are often added during reprogramming to loosen the chromatin, making the DNA more accessible to transcription factors. Molecules that inhibit histone...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuronal type-specific modulation of cognition and AP-1 signaling by early-life rearing conditions.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Effective modeling of the chromatin structure by coarse-grained methods.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2024
Same author

Author Correction: Mapping chromatin accessibility and active regulatory elements reveals pathological mechanisms in human gliomas.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

Author Correction: The role of epigenetic modifications, long-range contacts, enhancers and topologically associating domains in the regulation of glioma grade-specific genes.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

K-mer Content Changes with Node Degree in Promoter-Enhancer Network of Mouse ES Cells.

International journal of molecular sciences·2021
Same author

HERON: A Novel Tool Enables Identification of Long, Weakly Enriched Genomic Domains in ChIP-seq Data.

International journal of molecular sciences·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells
08:08

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 2, 2018

12.0K

Supervised learning method for predicting chromatin boundary associated insulator elements.

Paweł Bednarz1, Bartek Wilczyński

  • 1Institute of Informatics, Warsaw University, Banacha 2, Warsaw 02-089, Poland.

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
|November 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Supervised methods accurately predict chromatin boundary elements using Hi-C and modEncode data, outperforming unsupervised approaches. This computational model aids in identifying insulator positions in model organisms.

Keywords:
Bayesian networkChromatin boundaryinsulator elementrandom forest

More Related Videos

Isolation of Specific Genomic Regions and Identification of Associated Molecules by enChIP
09:26

Isolation of Specific Genomic Regions and Identification of Associated Molecules by enChIP

Published on: January 20, 2016

11.0K
Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells
08:08

Formaldehyde-assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements to Measure Chromatin Accessibility in Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 2, 2018

12.0K
Isolation of Specific Genomic Regions and Identification of Associated Molecules by enChIP
09:26

Isolation of Specific Genomic Regions and Identification of Associated Molecules by enChIP

Published on: January 20, 2016

11.0K
Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass
14:29

Efficient Chromatin Immunoprecipitation using Limiting Amounts of Biomass

Published on: May 1, 2013

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Chromatin folding dictates gene regulation in eukaryotic cells.
  • Understanding chromatin structure is crucial for deciphering gene interactions.
  • Current methods for identifying regulatory elements are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of supervised methods for predicting chromatin boundary elements.
  • To compare supervised approaches against unsupervised methods for insulator prediction.
  • To identify key features driving accurate chromatin boundary predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized supervised machine learning classifiers.
  • Employed boundary locations from Hi-C experiments as features.
  • Incorporated modEncode data tracks as predictive features.
  • Trained models to distinguish insulator elements from background sequences.

Main Results:

  • Supervised methods demonstrated high accuracy in predicting chromatin boundary elements.
  • The developed classifiers successfully identified known insulator locations and made novel predictions.
  • Key predictive features were consistent across different prediction methods.
  • Accurate insulator position predictions are feasible in model organisms with available ChIP-Seq and Hi-C data.

Conclusions:

  • Supervised learning offers a more effective approach for predicting chromatin boundary elements compared to unsupervised methods.
  • Computational models integrating Hi-C and modEncode data can accurately map insulator positions.
  • This predictive capability is valuable for understanding gene regulation and chromatin organization.