Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer
Arturo Evangelista1, Martin Czerny2, Christoph Nienaber3
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain aevangel@vhebron.net.
Insights
This study provides treatment guidelines for intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) of the aorta. Endovascular repair is recommended for complicated cases, while medical management is preferred for uncomplicated IMH and PAU.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are complex vascular conditions requiring specialized management.
- Current treatment strategies vary, necessitating evidence-based guidelines for optimal patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop consensus-based treatment algorithms for type B IMH and PAU.
- To review and synthesize existing literature on the management of these aortic pathologies.
Main Methods:
- An expert panel of cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists convened.
- A systematic literature review of 46 relevant studies involving 1386 patients (925 IMH, 461 PAU) was conducted.
- Consensus methods were employed to formulate treatment recommendations.
Main Results:
- For IMH, 30-day mortality was 3.9%, with 3-year event-related mortality: medical 5.4%, open surgery 23.2%, endovascular 7.1%.
- For PAU, 3-year event-related mortality: open surgery 25.0%, TEVAR 10.4%.
- Immediate intervention is indicated for hemodynamic instability, persistent pain, impending rupture, or progressive hemorrhage. Medical management is suitable for uncomplicated cases, with regular imaging surveillance.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular repair is the preferred treatment for complicated type B aortic PAU and IMH when anatomy is suitable.
- In the chronic phase, aortic diameter >55 mm or rapid expansion (≥ 5 mm/year) warrants consideration for open surgery or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), with TEVAR often preferred.
- Medical management with close monitoring is appropriate for stable, uncomplicated IMH and PAU.
Abstract:
An expert panel on the treatment of type B intramural haematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) consisting of cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists reviewed the literature to develop treatment algorithms using a consensus method. Data from 46 studies considered relevant were retrieved for a total of 1386 patients consisting of 925 with IMH, and 461 with PAU. The weighted mean 30-day mortality from IMH was 3.9%, 3-year aortic event-related mortality with medical treatment 5.4%, open surgery 23.2% and endovascular therapy 7.1%. In patients with PAU early and 3-year aortic event-mortality rates with open surgery were 15.9 and 25.0%, respectively, and with TEVAR were 7.2 and 10.4%, respectively. According to panel consensus statements, haemodynamic instability, persistent pain, signs of impending rupture and progressive periaortic haemorrhage in two successive imaging studies require immediate surgical or endovascular treatment. In the absence of these complications, medical treatment is warranted, with imaging control at 7 days, 3 and 6 months and annually thereafter. In the chronic phase, aortic diameter >55 mm or a yearly increase ≥ 5 mm should be considered indications for open surgery or thoracic endovascular treatment, with the latter being preferred. In complicated type B aortic PAU and IMH, endovascular repair is the best treatment option in the presence of suitable anatomy.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

