Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Qualitative Observation Tool for Folding, Writing, and Cutting in School-Aged Children: Hands-On!

Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie·2025

Same author

Extrinsic variability but not intrinsic variability affects the search for synergies in de-novo motor learning.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Effects of Different Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations on Clinical 3-Dimensional Wrist Joint Angles Estimation.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2025

Same author

Effects of game design characteristics of a virtual reality serious game for upper-limb prosthesis control training on motor learning.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences·2025

Same author

Should developmental coordination disorder be diagnosed before the age of 5 years?

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2025

Same author

Sharp Skills or Snipping Struggles? Qualitative Paper-Cutting Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Old Children Using Hands-On!

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

Individual differences in learning a novel discrete motor task.

Laura Golenia¹, Marina M Schoemaker¹, Leonora J Mouton¹

¹University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.

|November 12, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals show unique motor learning patterns when using new tools, like pliers. Learning involves distinct phases, and people vary in how these phases change with practice, highlighting the need to study individual differences in motor skill acquisition.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

Area of Science:

Motor learning
Human movement science
Robotics and human-computer interaction

Background:

Traditional motor learning research often overlooks individual variability in skill acquisition.
Everyday experience suggests significant differences in how people learn new motor tasks.
Understanding these individual differences is crucial for effective motor skill development and rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate individual differences in motor learning using a novel tool-use paradigm.
To characterize individual grasping profiles and their changes over practice.
To explore how tool geometry influences motor learning paths.

Main Methods:

Participants (n=30) learned to use custom pliers with varying hinge locations (Wider, Same, Smaller Beak groups).
Grasping actions were practiced 200 times over two days, with kinematic data (hand opening, closing, grasping time, maximum aperture) recorded.
Individual learning trajectories were analyzed using logarithmic functions to quantify changes in performance phases.

Main Results:

A three-phase grasping profile (opening, plateau, closing) was observed at the initial stage of learning.
Significant individual variability emerged in the number, magnitude, and direction of changes within these phases over practice.
Different pliers configurations led to distinct learning pathways, further emphasizing individual differences.

Conclusions:

Motor learning is not uniform; individual differences significantly shape the learning process and outcomes.
The study underscores the importance of considering personalized approaches in motor learning research and application.
Recognizing and analyzing individual learning trajectories provides deeper insights than focusing solely on average performance.