Treatment of multiple myeloma bone disease: experimental and clinical data

Yvonne Mary Papamerkouriou1, Eustathios Kenanidis, Zakareya Gamie

  • 1Aristotle University Medical School, "PapaGeorgiou" General Hospital, Academic Orthopaedic Unit , Thessaloniki , Greece etsiridis@doctors.org.uk.

Abstract

Insights

Bisphosphonates are standard for treating multiple myeloma bone disease, with zoledronic acid showing superiority despite side effects. Newer agents like denosumab and proteasome inhibitors offer promising therapeutic potential.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Bone Metabolism
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Multiple myeloma frequently causes bone disease, impacting patient quality of life and survival.
  • Therapeutic advancements include immunomodulating agents, proteasome inhibitors, and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand inhibitors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current and emerging treatments for multiple myeloma bone disease.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic agents.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence.
  • Databases searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (1950-2014).

Main Results:

  • Bisphosphonates (clodronate, pamidronate, zoledronic acid) are effective in preventing skeletal-related events.
  • Zoledronic acid demonstrates superior efficacy and potential survival benefits.
  • Denosumab shows comparable results to zoledronic acid, with ongoing evaluation.
  • Proteasome inhibitors are under investigation for their bone-protective effects.

Conclusions:

  • Bisphosphonates remain the primary treatment for myeloma bone disease.
  • Zoledronic acid is the preferred bisphosphonate, but requires side effect monitoring.
  • Denosumab is a viable alternative, though further evidence is needed.
  • Emerging therapies, including proteasome inhibitors, hold significant promise for managing myeloma-induced bone complications.

Related Concept Videos