Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses
Angela D Evans1, Stacia N Stolzenberg, Kang Lee
1Department of Psychology, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave., St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Abstract:
Prior research suggests that infelicitous choice of questions can significantly underestimate children's actual abilities, independently of suggestiveness. One possibly difficult question type is indirect speech acts such as "Do you know..." questions (DYK, e.g., "Do you know where it happened?"). These questions directly ask if respondents know, while indirectly asking what respondents know. If respondents answer "yes," but fail to elaborate, they are either ignoring or failing to recognize the indirect question (known as pragmatic failure). Two studies examined the effect of indirect speech acts on maltreated and non-maltreated 2- to 7-year-olds' post-event interview responses. Children were read a story and later interviewed using DYK and Wh- questions. Additionally, children completed a series of executive functioning tasks. Both studies revealed that using DYK questions increased the chances of pragmatic failure, particularly for younger children and those with lower inhibitory control skills.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Naturalistic Observations
Bullying
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Observational Learning

