Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

3.7K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.7K
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions01:03

Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions

4.5K
Nursing interventions are chosen as part of the planning process to achieve patient outcomes. Once nursing diagnoses are determined, the goals and outcomes are specified, then the nursing interventions are selected and individualized according to the patient's situation.
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
4.5K
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

63
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
63
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

582
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
582
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

623
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
623
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

2.2K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global Health Security Index and COVID-19 pandemic mortality 2020-2021: a comparative study of islands and non-islands across 194 jurisdictions.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Predicting the preservation of buried ore deposits using deep-time landscape evolution modeling.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Capacity to manufacture key pharmaceuticals in New Zealand after a global catastrophe.

The New Zealand medical journal·2025
Same author

Impact of Covid-19 control strategies on health and GDP growth outcomes in 193 sovereign jurisdictions.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

Public Attitudes to Responding to Global Catastrophic Risks: A New Zealand Case Study.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025
Same author

The frequently impaired health of leaders of nuclear weapon states: an analysis of 51 deceased leaders.

BMC research notes·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.8K

A method for prioritizing interventions following root cause analysis (RCA): lessons from philosophy.

Matt Boyd1

  • 1Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|November 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Root cause analysis (RCA) identifies many causes of adverse events but struggles to prioritize them. Integrating philosophy of causation can refine RCA, focusing interventions on the most impactful factors.

Keywords:
adverse eventscausationexplanationinterventionpatient safetyroot cause analysis

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Philosophy of science
  • Causal inference

Background:

  • Root cause analysis (RCA) is a mandated method for investigating adverse events in healthcare.
  • Current RCA methods identify multiple contributing factors but lack robust mechanisms for causal prioritization.
  • Effective intervention design requires distinguishing critical causes from numerous contributing factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how philosophical approaches to causation and explanation can enhance RCA.
  • To argue that integrating causal reasoning from philosophy can improve the effectiveness of RCA.
  • To address the limitations of current RCA in distinguishing the causal importance of identified factors.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes integrating Strevens' kairetic approach to explanation.
  • It suggests incorporating Tinbergen's four questions for explaining behavior.
  • These philosophical frameworks are presented as synergistic additions to existing RCA methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Lessons from the philosophy of causation and explanation can significantly benefit RCA.
  • Philosophical literature offers valuable insights for understanding causal relationships in adverse events.
  • Applying these insights can lead to a more nuanced understanding of contributing factors.

Conclusions:

  • Enhanced understanding of causation can improve the effectiveness of RCA.
  • This approach aims to reduce the number of intervention targets by focusing on critical causes.
  • Prioritizing interventions based on causal importance can lead to more effective harm reduction strategies.