Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

09:35
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
18.5K
Summary
This study used a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic factors influencing plasma plasminogen levels. Researchers discovered key genetic variations associated with these important blood protein levels.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Hematology
Background:
- Plasma plasminogen levels are crucial for blood clot breakdown.
- Genetic factors influencing plasminogen levels are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first agnostic genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic determinants of plasma plasminogen level variation.
Main Methods:
- Genome-wide association study (GWAS) was employed.
- Analysis focused on identifying genetic loci associated with plasma plasminogen levels.
Main Results:
- The study identified specific genetic variations linked to differences in plasma plasminogen concentrations.
- These findings provide novel insights into the genetic architecture of plasminogen regulation.
Conclusions:
- The GWAS successfully identified genetic determinants of plasma plasminogen levels.
- Further research can explore the functional impact of these genetic variations on hemostasis and thrombosis.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
17.3K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
17.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.7K
Statistical Significance
24.6K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
24.6K
Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
Significance Testing: Overview
13.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.2K
The Availability Heuristic
7.3K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.3K

