Review of the safety profile for microfocused ultrasound with visualization

Thomas M Hitchcock1, Marek K Dobke

  • 1Ulthera, Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA.

Insights

Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V) demonstrates a strong safety profile, with mild and temporary side effects being most common. Rare adverse events are typically linked to improper technique and resolve without lasting issues.

Area of Science:

  • Aesthetics and Dermatology
  • Medical Device Safety

Background:

  • Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V) is a widely used aesthetic treatment.
  • Establishing the safety profile of MFU-V is crucial for clinical practice and patient confidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and discuss the safety profile of MFU-V.
  • To consolidate data on adverse events (AEs) and side effects from various sources.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of published peer-reviewed literature.
  • Analysis of clinical study data.
  • Examination of in-market use reports and manufacturer-reported AEs.
  • Retrospective chart reviews of patient treatments.

Main Results:

  • Typical side effects include transient tenderness, redness, and mild edema.
  • Rare adverse events observed were bruising, welting, and temporary nerve-related effects (paresthesia, paresis).
  • Surface thermal effects were rare and associated with improper technique.

Conclusions:

  • MFU-V is consistently safe when correct treatment techniques are employed.
  • Reported side effects are generally mild, transient, and resolve without sequelae.
  • Unexpected or rare AEs are often attributable to incorrect technique or unrelated factors.