Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
Published on: January 9, 2014
Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis: A comparison of molecular electrostatic
R T Kroemer1, P Hecht, K R Liedl
1Sandoz Forschungsinstitut GmbH, Brunnerstrasse 59, A-1235 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) is a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) method which correlates precalculated fields surrounding a set of molecules with some target property. Among others, the electrostatic fields are commonly used. These are usually generated by calculating the Coulomb potential between a probe and the molecules bearing atom-centered point charges. The present study was performed in order to investigate up to which extent different methods to calculate electrostatic potentials can influence the results of a CoMFA. Therefore, a variety of charge calculation methods was applied to a data set consisting of 37 ligands of the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist-antagonist active site. These methods included Gasteiger-Marsili, semiempirical (MNDO, AM1, and PM3), and ab initio (HF/STO-3G, HF/3-21G*, and HF/6-31G*) charges. Semiempirical as well as ab initio electron populations were derived both from the Mulliken population analysis (MPA) or from fitting the charges to the molecular electrostatic potential (ESPFIT charges). In addition, the molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) resulting from ab initio calculations were mapped directly onto the CoMFA grid. With regard to the cross-validated r(2) values (r(2) cv ) of the resulting QSAR models, the ESPFIT-derived potentials yielded generally higher r(2) cv values than those resulting from MPA charges. For example, at the HF/3-21G* level the r(2) cv rose from 0.61 (MPA-derived potentials) to 0.76 (ESPFIT fields). The MEPs mapped directly onto the CoMFA grid were not superior to the corresponding ESPFIT-derived potentials. Semiempirical ESPFIT charges appeared to be of similar quality compared with ab initio ESPFIT electron populations in the CoMFAs. When no scaling between the steric and electrostatic descriptor matrices was applied, the electrostatic contributions were influenced to a high degree by the magnitude of the corresponding field values. © 1996 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Capillary Electrophoresis: Applications
Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) separates ionic components based on their electrophoretic mobility. It has been used to separate proteins, amino acids,...
Induced Electric Dipoles
Since the absolute value of potential energy holds no physical meaning, its zero value can be chosen as per...
Molecular Models
Electric Field of Two Equal and Opposite Charges
A separation of the positive and negative charges can lead to a weak, remnant effect of the positive and negative charges. The expectation is that the more the distance between the positive and...

