Development, reliability and validation of a neurogenic bowel dysfunction score in pediatric patients with spina

Maryellen S Kelly1, Margaret Hannan2, Brenda Cassidy2

  • 1University of California Irvine, Urology Center, CHOC Children's Hospital, Orange, California.

Insights

A new questionnaire reliably monitors neurogenic bowel symptoms in children, accurately distinguishing between affected and healthy individuals. Further validation in larger studies is recommended.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Assessment Tools
  • Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction

Background:

  • Neurogenic bowel symptoms significantly impact children's quality of life.
  • Accurate monitoring tools are essential for effective management.
  • Existing assessment methods may lack reliability and validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a questionnaire for monitoring neurogenic bowel symptoms in pediatric patients.
  • To establish the reliability and validity of the developed questionnaire.
  • To differentiate between children with and without neurogenic bowel.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire was developed by an expert panel and refined through interviews.
  • Intra-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (k) and paired t-tests.
  • Inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and discriminate validity were evaluated using k, Spearman correlations, and ROC curves.

Main Results:

  • High intra-rater reliability (85% with k >0.6) and inter-rater reliability (97% with k >0.6) were achieved.
  • Strong positive correlation (rs = 0.943) between patient/caregiver and nurse scores.
  • The questionnaire demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating neurogenic bowel patients (AUC=0.9, sensitivity=94%, specificity=87% at score 8.5).

Conclusions:

  • The developed questionnaire is reliable and valid for assessing pediatric neurogenic bowel symptoms.
  • The tool effectively distinguishes between neurogenic and normal bowel function in children.
  • Further validation in larger cohorts is recommended to confirm findings.
Abstract