The Efficacy of Surfactant Replacement Therapy in the Growth-Restricted Preterm Infant: What is the Evidence?

Atul Malhotra1, Arun Sasi2, Suzanne L Miller3

  • 1Monash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital , Melbourne, VIC , Australia ; The Ritchie Centre, Monash Institute of Medical Research , Melbourne, VIC , Australia ; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.

Frontiers in Pediatrics
|November 18, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) is crucial for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, its effectiveness in preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) lung disease remains unstudied, requiring further research.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatology
  • Pulmonology
  • Perinatal Medicine

Background:

  • Surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) is a standard treatment for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants.
  • The efficacy of SRT in preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) lung disease has not been systematically evaluated.
  • Understanding SRT's role in IUGR neonates is crucial for optimizing respiratory support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of exogenous SRT in managing lung disease in preterm infants with IUGR.
  • To systematically review existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on SRT in preterm IUGR infants.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted following Cochrane collaboration guidelines.
  • Eligible RCTs compared neonatal respiratory outcomes between preterm IUGR and appropriately grown for gestational age (AGA) infants receiving SRT.
  • Studies evaluating SRT specifically in preterm IUGR populations were sought.

Main Results:

  • No studies directly assessed SRT efficacy in preterm IUGR infants compared to AGA infants.
  • One study used small for gestational age (SGA) infants as a proxy for IUGR.
  • SGA infants showed no difference in intubation, RDS severity, or air leaks but had increased need for CPAP, oxygen, and higher incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Conclusions:

  • Insufficient data exists to determine the efficacy of SRT in preterm IUGR lung disease.
  • Further research using diverse strategies is necessary to understand SRT's role and rationale in this population.
Abstract