Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026
05:26
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
7.4K
A methodological systematic review of what's wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
Emma F France1, Nicola Ring, Rebecca Thomas
1Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling and Glasgow Caledonian University, Unit 13 Scion House, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling FK9 4NF, Scotland, UK. emma.france@stir.ac.uk.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|November 20, 2014
Summary
This review found that meta-ethnography reporting is often unclear, hindering the use of qualitative synthesis for health policy and patient experience insights. Improved reporting guidelines are needed to ensure the rigor and credibility of these valuable studies.
Area of Science:
- Qualitative research synthesis
- Health services research
- Patient experience studies
Background:
- Meta-ethnography is a systematic qualitative synthesis method valuable for informing health policy and understanding patient experiences.
- Concerns exist regarding the quality of reporting for meta-ethnography, particularly in the analysis and synthesis stages.
- This study aimed to evaluate the application and reporting of methods in recent meta-ethnography publications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the application and reporting of methods in meta-ethnography journal papers.
- To focus specifically on the analysis and synthesis processes and their reported outputs.
- To identify areas for improvement in meta-ethnography methodology and reporting.
Main Methods:
- Methodological systematic review of health-related meta-ethnography papers published between 2012-2013.
- Searched six electronic databases, Google Scholar, and Zetoc using relevant keywords.
- Data extraction and content analysis were performed by multiple authors to assess methodological reporting.
Main Results:
- Meta-ethnography was applied inconsistently, with 13% of studies not suiting the research aim and 66% deviating from core principles.
- Reporting of analytical and synthesis processes was poor; only 31% clearly described conceptual data analysis and 3% detailed the analytic synthesis process.
- In 38% of papers, the achievement of new interpretation was unclear, and over 30% did not cite key methodological texts.
Conclusions:
- This review highlights significant gaps in the clarity and comprehensiveness of meta-ethnography reporting, impacting the assessment of rigor and credibility.
- Meta-ethnography is an evolving methodology, and current reporting practices present a barrier to fully utilizing its potential for health care and patient experience research.
- Developing tailored reporting guidelines through expert consensus is recommended to enhance the reporting and maximize the value of meta-ethnography findings.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.5K
01:18The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
19.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
19.4K
01:56Ethics in Research
26.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.3K
01:40Archival Research
17.6K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
17.6K
01:24Humanistic Psychology
3.2K
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
This approach...
3.2K
01:22Bias
8.1K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.1K