Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
Published on: August 2, 2024
Choosing wisely: the American Society for Radiation Oncology's top 5 list
Carol Hahn1, Brian Kavanagh2, Ajay Bhatnagar3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Purpose:
To highlight 5 interventions that patients should question, as part of the Choosing Wisely campaign. This initiative, led by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, fosters conversations between physicians and patients about treatments and tests that may be overused, unnecessary, or potentially harmful.
Methods And Materials:
Potential items were initially compiled using an online survey. They were then evaluated and refined by a work group representing the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Clinical Affairs and Quality, Health Policy, and Government Relations Councils. Literature reviews were carried out to support the recommendation and narrative, as well as to provide references for each item. A final list of 5 items was then selected by the ASTRO Board of Directors.
Results:
ASTRO's 5 recommendations for the Choosing Wisely campaign are the following: (1) Don't initiate whole-breast radiation therapy as a part of breast conservation therapy in women age ≥50 with early-stage invasive breast cancer without considering shorter treatment schedules; (2) don't initiate management of low-risk prostate cancer without discussing active surveillance; (3) don't routinely use extended fractionation schemes (>10 fractions) for palliation of bone metastases; (4) don't routinely recommend proton beam therapy for prostate cancer outside of a prospective clinical trial or registry; and (5) don't routinely use intensity modulated radiation therapy to deliver whole-breast radiation therapy as part of breast conservation therapy.
Conclusions:
The ASTRO list for the Choosing Wisely campaign highlights radiation oncology interventions that should be discussed between physicians and patients before treatment is initiated. These 5 items provide opportunities to offer higher quality and less costly care.
Insights
Patients should question 5 radiation oncology interventions to improve care quality. The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) identified treatments that may be overused, unnecessary, or harmful, promoting informed patient-physician discussions.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Oncology
Background:
- The Choosing Wisely campaign encourages discussions about potentially overused medical tests and treatments.
- The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation leads this initiative to foster informed patient-physician dialogue.
- Unnecessary or harmful interventions can impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and highlight five specific radiation oncology interventions for patient and physician consideration.
- To promote evidence-based discussions regarding the necessity and appropriateness of certain cancer treatments.
- To align with the Choosing Wisely campaign's goals of improving healthcare value.
Main Methods:
- A work group from the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evaluated potential interventions.
- Online surveys and literature reviews were used to support recommendations.
- The ASTRO Board of Directors finalized a list of five key interventions.
Main Results:
- Five ASTRO recommendations for the Choosing Wisely campaign were identified.
- These include considerations for whole-breast radiation therapy schedules, active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, avoiding routine extended fractionation for bone metastases, limiting proton beam therapy for prostate cancer, and judicious use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for whole-breast radiation.
- Recommendations focus on optimizing treatment based on patient-specific factors and evidence.
Conclusions:
- The ASTRO list provides crucial talking points for physicians and patients regarding radiation oncology treatments.
- Implementing these recommendations can lead to higher quality and more cost-effective cancer care.
- Discussions should precede the initiation of these highlighted interventions.