Growth assessment in diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction. Review

A R Albu1, I A Horhoianu1, M C Dumitrascu1

  • 1"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Insights

Accurately assessing fetal growth is crucial for identifying growth-restricted fetuses at risk of complications. This review discusses methods like Symphyseal-Fundal Height (SFH) and ultrasound parameters (AC, EFW) to differentiate between normal and abnormal fetal growth.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Fetal Medicine
  • Perinatal Health

Background:

  • Fetal growth assessment is vital for identifying growth restriction, linked to perinatal morbidity and mortality.
  • Distinguishing physiologically small fetuses from growth-restricted ones remains a clinical challenge.
  • Accurate assessment aids in targeted surveillance and management of at-risk pregnancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss methods for assessing fetal growth.
  • To highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various fetal growth assessment tools.
  • To address the ongoing debate in differentiating normal small fetuses from growth-restricted ones.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical tools for fetal growth assessment.
  • Discussion of Symphyseal-Fundal Height (SFH) measurement.
  • Analysis of fetal ultrasound parameters: Abdominal Circumference (AC) and Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW).
  • Examination of different types of growth charts: populational, standard, individualized, customized, and growth trajectories.

Main Results:

  • Various clinical and ultrasound methods exist for fetal growth assessment.
  • Different growth charts (populational, standard, individualized, customized) offer varied approaches.
  • No single method perfectly discriminates all cases, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate fetal growth assessment is critical for perinatal outcomes.
  • A combination of clinical and ultrasound methods, alongside appropriate growth charts, is recommended.
  • Further research may refine methods to better distinguish between normal and abnormal fetal growth patterns.