Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026
Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
Improved contractility with tepid modified full blood cardioplegia compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia in a
Frank Münch1, Ariawan Purbojo1, Stephanie Kellermann1
1Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Objectives:
Experience regarding warm blood cardioplegia according to Calafiore results from its broad use in adult patients. In this experimental study, tepid (28°C) modified full blood cardioplegia (MBC) was adopted for paediatric use and compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CCC).
Methods:
Twenty male piglets (mean weight: 11.1 ± 1.0 kg) were operated on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in moderate hypothermia (28°C) and randomized to MBC (n = 8) or CCC (n = 12) for 60 min aortic cross-clamping. Blood levels of myocardial proteins [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), myoglobin, creatine kinase type MB and troponin-I] were investigated at the beginning of the experiment and after CPB. Haemodynamic measurements included thermodilution and conductance-catheter technique inserted through the left ventricle-apex. Pressure-volume loop analysis was performed with dobutamine-stress test and inflow occlusion, enabling preload independent evaluation of myocardial performance. Changes of measured data post-CPB were calculated in relation to baseline-levels (%).
Results:
Baseline and operative data in both groups were similar. During the experiment, cardiac markers showed no significant variations between groups. Pressure-volume loop analysis during stress test revealed a significantly higher preload independent contractility (slope of end-systolic pressure-volume relation: Ees) with MBC compared with CCC (MBC: 123 ± 35% [confidence interval (CI95): 93-153] vs CCC: 78 ± 34% [CI95: 54-102]; P = 0.042), whereas cardiac output was not significantly different between groups {MBC: 122 ± 16% [95% confidence interval (CI95): 109-135] vs CCC: 105 ± 17% [CI95: 93-116]; P = 0.069}.
Conclusion:
This randomized animal study proves feasibility and safety of MBC for paediatric use. Haemodynamic evaluation and cardiac markers did not show inferiority to standard CCC. Moreover, MBC seems to be associated with superior contractility post bypass, which encourages us to use MBC in paediatric patients in the near future.
