Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Toddlers' Active Gaze Behavior Supports Self-Supervised Object Learning.

Developmental science·2026

Same author

Re-assessing the Evidence for MR Abilities in Children Using Computational Models.

Developmental science·2026

Same author

Efficient coding in active perception: A developmental perspective on autonomous control.

Advances in child development and behavior·2026

Same author

Infants and Mobiles: Developing an Understanding of Cause and Effect.

Developmental science·2026

Same author

Simulated Cortical Magnification Supports Self-Supervised Object Learning.

IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning·2026

Same author

Predictive coding with spiking neural networks: A survey.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Electrophysiological and Morphological Characterization of Neuronal Microcircuits in Acute Brain Slices Using Paired Patch-Clamp Recordings

Electrophysiological and Morphological Characterization of Neuronal Microcircuits in Acute Brain Slices Using Paired Patch-Clamp Recordings

Published on: January 10, 2015

Slicing, sampling, and distance-dependent effects affect network measures in simulated cortical circuit structures.

Daniel C Miner¹, Jochen Triesch¹

¹Department of Neuroscience, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

|November 22, 2014

Summary

Cortical circuit connectivity exhibits nonrandom patterns. A geometric network model explains these features and resolves conflicting experimental data on bidirectional connectivity, attributing discrepancies to experimental parameters.

Keywords:

common neighbor cortical networks cortical slices graph theory motifs network topology nonrandom connectivity

More Related Videos

Acute Mouse Brain Slicing to Investigate Spontaneous Hippocampal Network Activity

Acute Mouse Brain Slicing to Investigate Spontaneous Hippocampal Network Activity

Published on: August 28, 2020

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Electrophysiological and Morphological Characterization of Neuronal Microcircuits in Acute Brain Slices Using Paired Patch-Clamp Recordings

Electrophysiological and Morphological Characterization of Neuronal Microcircuits in Acute Brain Slices Using Paired Patch-Clamp Recordings

Published on: January 10, 2015

Acute Mouse Brain Slicing to Investigate Spontaneous Hippocampal Network Activity

Acute Mouse Brain Slicing to Investigate Spontaneous Hippocampal Network Activity

Published on: August 28, 2020

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Network Science

Background:

Cortical circuits display nonrandom connectivity patterns like clustering and reciprocal connections.
Existing data on bidirectional connectivity in cortical slices appear contradictory.
The underlying principles governing neuroanatomical connectivity remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the origins of nonrandom features in cortical neuroanatomical connectivity.
To develop a model explaining observed connectivity patterns and experimental discrepancies.
To propose explanations for conflicting findings regarding bidirectional connectivity.

Main Methods:

Development of a simple static geometric network model.
Incorporation of distance-dependent connectivity on a realistic scale.
Analysis of model outputs to identify emergent network properties.

Main Results:

The geometric model naturally reproduces several experimentally observed nonrandom network features.
Model analysis suggests bidirectional connectivity is sensitive to experimental parameters like slice thickness and sampling area.
These sensitivities offer a potential explanation for conflicting experimental results.

Conclusions:

A static geometric network model can explain key nonrandom features of cortical connectivity.
Experimental parameters significantly influence the measurement of bidirectional connectivity.
The model provides a framework for resolving discrepancies in empirical findings on cortical network structure.