Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
Published on: February 23, 2015
A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators
Jens Mazei1, Joachim Hüffmeier2, Philipp Alexander Freund3
1Department of Psychology, University of Münster.
Men tend to achieve better economic negotiation outcomes than women. However, these gender differences in negotiation performance are context-dependent and can be reduced or reversed by factors like experience and information.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Organizational Behavior
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Role congruity theory suggests negotiation behaviors align more with male gender roles, potentially disadvantaging women.
- Existing research indicates gender disparities in economic negotiation outcomes, but contextual influences are underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To meta-analytically investigate gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes.
- To examine how person-based, situation-based, and task-based factors moderate these gender differences.
- To test the role congruity theory's predictions regarding gender and negotiation.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis synthesizing 123 effect sizes from studies with a total of 10,888 participants (students and businesspeople).
- Multilevel modeling was employed to analyze the aggregated data and identify moderator effects.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting effect sizes for gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes.
Main Results:
- On average, men achieved significantly better economic negotiation outcomes than women.
- Contextual factors substantially moderated gender differences: experience, bargaining range information, and negotiating for others reduced the male advantage.
- Gender differences were reversed in situations with low role incongruity for women.
Conclusions:
- Gender differences in economic negotiation outcomes are not absolute but are highly context-specific.
- Situational and individual factors can mitigate or even reverse traditional gender disparities in negotiations.
- Findings have implications for understanding workplace gender inequality and developing targeted interventions.
More Related Videos
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
07:23Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
Relationship Formation
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Panic Disorder
Stereotype Content Model