Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

742
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
742
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

38.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
38.1K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

885
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
885
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

96.1K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
96.1K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

332
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
332
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ADHD Individuals' Positivity About Their Condition Varies by Their Levels of Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Versus Inattention Symptoms.

Journal of attention disorders·2026
Same author

The hidden threat: Attending to passive risks heightens fear and risk perception.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Favorable safety outcomes of a perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in cancer patients in four randomized controlled trials.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2026
Same author

Visual distraction and experience-based suppression in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A registered report.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

Autism-associated learning patterns show reduced credit assignment to outcome-irrelevant features.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Bias is not color blind: Ignoring gender and race leads to suboptimal selection decisions-A registered report.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K

Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.

Olga Entel1, Joseph Tzelgov2,3, Yoella Bereby-Meyer2

  • 1Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer Sheva, 84105, Israel. entel@post.bgu.ac.il.

Psychological Research
|November 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals the Stroop task has two conflicts: task and informational. Their interaction is not additive, with task conflict sometimes explaining negative facilitation effects.

Keywords:
ControlInformational conflictNegative facilitationStroop taskTask conflict

More Related Videos

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.6K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

42.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.6K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

42.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Stroop task is a common tool for studying cognitive control.
  • It is proposed to involve both task conflict and informational conflict.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the proposal that the Stroop task involves two distinct conflicts: task conflict and informational conflict.
  • To investigate the interaction between these two types of conflict.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulated task conflict by varying the proportion of color words versus neutral stimuli.
  • Manipulated informational conflict by altering the ratio of incongruent to congruent trials.
  • Measured latency differences between conditions to quantify conflict effects.

Main Results:

  • Replicated findings that increasing either conflict type reduces its respective latency difference.
  • Observed a significant under-additive interaction between task and informational conflict manipulations.
  • Demonstrated that task conflict is present across conditions and can explain negative facilitation.

Conclusions:

  • Task and informational conflict in the Stroop task do not have additive effects.
  • Negative facilitation is a specific instance of task conflict under certain conditions.