Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Statistical consequences of using bone mineral density to pair cadaver femurs in comparative ex vivo hip fracture
T Basso1, J Klaksvik1, O A Foss1
1St. Olavs Hospital, Orthopaedic Research Centre, Department of Orthopaedics, Postboks 3250 Sluppen, 7006 Trondheim, Norway.
Objective:
In ex vivo hip fracture studies femoral pairs are split to create two comparable test groups. When more than two groups are required, or if paired femurs cannot be obtained, group allocation according to bone mineral density (BMD) is sometimes performed. In this statistical experiment we explore how this affects experimental results and sample size considerations.
Methods:
In a hip fracture experiment, nine pairs of human cadaver femurs were tested in a paired study design. The femurs were then re-matched according to BMD, creating two new test groups. Intra-pair variance and paired correlations in fixation stability were calculated. A hypothetical power analysis was then performed to explore the required sample size for the two types of group allocation.
Results:
The standard deviation (sd) of the mean paired difference in fixation stability increased from 2 mm in donor pairs to 5 mm in BMD-matched pairs. Intra-pair correlation was 0.953 (Pearson's r) in donor pairs and non-significant at -0.134 (Pearson's r) in BMD-matched pairs. Required sample size to achieve a statistical power of 0.8 increased from ten pairs using donor pairs to 54 pairs using BMD-matched pairs.
Conclusion:
BMD cannot be used to create comparable test groups unless sample size is increased substantially and paired statistics are no longer valid. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:317-20.
More Related Videos
08:04Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017
10:39Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology
Published on: December 7, 2011