Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluating the Artificial Intelligence Driven Monitoring System Notifications: Clear Aligner and Oral Hygiene Perspectives.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026

Same author

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial toothpastes on periodontal bacteria in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled study.

Journal of orthodontic science·2026

Same author

Evaluating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression during canine retraction: A comparison between periodontal distraction versus conventional retraction.

Journal of orthodontic science·2026

Same author

Accuracy of digital vs. manual cephalometric tracing: A systematic review.

International orthodontics·2025

Same author

Reliability and Performance of Four Large Language Models in Orthodontic Knowledge Assessment.

Journal of dental education·2025

Same author

Condylar volume changes in class II division 2 cases treated with unlocking the mandible using clear aligners.

Journal of the World federation of orthodontists·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Comparison of two three-dimensional cephalometric analysis computer software.

Dena Sawchuk¹, Adel Alhadlaq², Thamer Alkhadra²

¹Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.

Journal of Orthodontic Science

|November 27, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

InVivoDental5.0 offers more reproducible and user-friendly three-dimensional cephalometric analysis than 3DCeph™. While both softwares yield statistically similar orthodontic treatment outcomes, InVivoDental5.0 is more efficient.

Keywords:

3DCeph™InVivoDental cephalometric analysis software three-dimensional

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Area of Science:

Orthodontics
Radiology
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis is increasingly utilized in orthodontics.
Evaluating orthodontic treatment outcomes with 3D cephalometrics requires reliable software tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the reliability and usability of two software programs for 3D cephalometric analysis.
To assess orthodontic treatment outcomes using InVivoDental5.0 and 3DCeph™.

Main Methods:

Twenty cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were analyzed using InVivoDental5.0 and 3DCeph™.
Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired t-tests were employed for reliability and comparison.

Main Results:

InVivoDental5.0 demonstrated stronger reliability (ICC: 0.83-0.98) compared to 3DCeph™ (ICC: 0.51-0.90).
No statistically significant differences were found between the two softwares in linear or angular measurements.
3DCeph™ analysis was more time-consuming than InVivoDental5.0.

Conclusions:

InVivoDental5.0 is more reproducible and user-friendly for 3D cephalometric analysis in orthodontics.
Both software options provide comparable measurements for assessing orthodontic treatment results.
InVivoDental5.0 is recommended for its efficiency and reliability.