Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Influence of placement depth and abutment connection pattern on bone remodeling around 1-stage implants: a
Iro Palaska1, Phoebus Tsaousoglou2, Ioannis Vouros2
1Molecular Immunopharmacology and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology and Pathobiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Objectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate peri-implant marginal bone level changes in relation to crestal or subcrestal implant placement and type of fixture/abutment connection 3 months after implant placement.
Materials And Methods:
The duration of the study was 3 months. A total of 105 implants were placed in 81 subjects following a one-stage surgical procedure and assigned into four groups. In the first and second groups, implants with a screwed tapered internal connection were placed subcrestally and crestally, respectively, while in the third and fourth groups, implants with an internal conical seal connection were similarly placed. Clinical recordings and standardized periapical digital radiographs were taken the day of implantation and 3 months later, before placement of the final prosthetic restoration. The modified plaque index (mPLI), modified gingival index (mGI), and probing depths (PD) were recorded at four sites around each implant, and the vertical distance between fixture/abutment junction and alveolar crest at the mesial and distal sites of each implant utilizing subtractive radiography were all measured on placement and at 3 months.
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PD. The highest values of mPLI and mGI were recorded for Group 2. The mean (±SE) peri-implant bone loss was recorded as follows: Group 1: 0.68 ± 0.07 mm, Group 2: 0.79 ± 0.06 mm, Group 3: 0.49 ± 0.06 mm, and Group 4: 0.40 ± 0.07 mm. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in bone resorption between groups with different abutment connections.
Conclusions:
The connection between fixture/abutment rather than vertical implant placement in relation to alveolar bone level seems to affect peri-implant marginal bone resorption.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Bone Remodeling and Repair
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...

