Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Management of vascular risk factors in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)
James F Meschia1, Jenifer H Voeks2, Pierre P Leimgruber3
1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL (J.F.M., M.L., T.G.B.).
Insights
Vascular risk factor control improved significantly in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). However, optimal control of these factors remained suboptimal for most patients throughout the study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) evaluated stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid disease.
- This study specifically assessed the management of vascular risk factors within the CREST trial population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of site-based management of vascular risk factors in patients undergoing carotid revascularization.
- To determine the degree of improvement and the rate of optimal control for key vascular risk factors over time.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 2210 patients in the CREST trial.
- Biannual monitoring of risk factors including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and smoking status.
- Generalized estimating equations used to compare baseline risk factors with follow-up data up to 48 months.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements were observed in the control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and smoking status from baseline to 48 months.
- The percentage of patients achieving optimal risk-factor control (all four goals) increased significantly from 16.7% to 36.2% (P<0.001).
- Despite improvements, approximately two-thirds of participants did not achieve optimal risk-factor control during the study period.
Conclusions:
- Site-based management led to significant improvements in vascular risk factor control in the CREST trial, both short-term and long-term.
- Overall risk factor control, however, remained suboptimal for a majority of patients.
- The findings suggest that more intensive medical management strategies should be considered for future carotid revascularization trials.
Background:
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) is a multicenter randomized trial of stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease. This study assesses management of vascular risk factors.
Methods And Results:
Management was provided by the patient's physician, with biannual monitoring results collected by the local site. Therapeutic targets were low-density lipoprotein, cholesterol <100 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, fasting blood glucose <126 mg/dL, and nonsmoking status. Optimal control was defined as achieving all 4 goals concurrently. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare risk factors at baseline with those observed in scheduled follow-up visits for up to 48 months. In the analysis cohort of 2210, significant improvements in risk-factor control were observed across risk factors for all follow-up visits compared with baseline. At 48 months, achievement of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal improved from 59.1% to 73.6% (P<0.001), achievement of the systolic blood pressure goal improved from 51.6% to 65.1% (P<0.001), achievement of the glucose goal improved from 74.9% to 80.7% (P=0.0101), and nonsmoking improved from 74.4% to 80.9% (P<0.0001). The percentage with optimal risk-factor control also improved significantly, from 16.7% to 36.2% (P<0.001), but nearly 2 of 3 study participants did not achieve optimal control during the study.
Conclusions:
Site-based risk-factor control improved significantly in the first 6 months and over the long term in CREST but was often suboptimal. Intensive medical management should be considered for future trials of carotid revascularization.
Clinical Trial Registration Url:
ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00004732.
More Related Videos
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care