Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

102.3K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
102.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.3K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.3K
Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

781.3K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
781.3K
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing01:05

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

13.9K
In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
13.9K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

22.3K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
22.3K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

19.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
19.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic approach to episodic ataxia types 1 and 2: a proposed algorithm for limited resource-settings.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Characterization of Genetic Etiologic Factors for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Large Childhood Cancer Survivorship Cohorts.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Author Response: Genetic Associations With an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Reversal Phenotype.

Neurology·2025
Same author

Genetic Associations With an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Reversal Phenotype.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Outcomes for children with recurrent/refractory atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: A single-institution study with molecular correlation.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2024
Same author

Proteome-wide association study and functional validation identify novel protein markers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

GigaScience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

17.5K

Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.

Dalia H Ghoneim1, Jason R Myers, Emily Tuttle

  • 1Center for Neural Development and Disease, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA. Dalia_Ghoneim@urmc.rochester.edu.

BMC Research Notes
|December 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Comparing indel detection algorithms on human genomic data revealed significant variability. HaplotypeCaller excelled in targeted sequencing, while Pindel identified large deletions effectively, suggesting tailored best practices for genomic variant analysis.

More Related Videos

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

40.3K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing
11:11

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

17.5K
Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing
06:58

Collection and Extraction of Saliva DNA for Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 27, 2014

40.3K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Insertions/deletions (indels) are common genomic variants, posing challenges for accurate identification in next-generation sequencing (NGS) data.
  • Existing indel detection algorithms lack comprehensive comparison on diverse human genomic datasets.
  • Optimal guidelines for detecting biologically significant indels are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of three indel detection algorithms (Pindel, GATK UnifiedGenotyper, GATK HaplotypeCaller) on various human genomic data types.
  • To identify variations in indel calls across different algorithms and data types.
  • To establish best practices for indel calling based on algorithm strengths and data characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three human NGS datasets: targeted exon sequencing (200 genes, 48 samples), whole exome sequencing (45 samples), and whole genome sequencing (2 samples).
  • Application of Pindel, GATK UnifiedGenotyper, and GATK HaplotypeCaller for indel detection.
  • Evaluation of algorithm performance based on call concordance, validation rates, and detection of different indel sizes.

Main Results:

  • Significant variation in indel calls was observed among the three algorithms, with low concordance rates across datasets (5.70%–19.52%).
  • HaplotypeCaller demonstrated the most reliable results for targeted exon sequencing with consistent parameters.
  • Pindel required parameter adjustments for optimal performance but excelled at identifying large deletions beyond GATK's capabilities.

Conclusions:

  • Algorithm choice impacts indel detection accuracy; HaplotypeCaller is recommended for short indels in high-depth targeted sequencing.
  • Pindel, with optimized parameters, is suitable for detecting larger indels in lower-depth data.
  • Tailored best practices are essential for maximizing the reliability of indel identification across diverse genomic datasets.