Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Assessment of Dictyostelium discoideum Response to Acute Mechanical Stimulation
Published on: November 9, 2017
Effect of Cdc42 domains on filopodia sensing, cell orientation, and haptotaxis
Surya P Amarachintha1, Kenneth J Ryan2, Marilyn Cayer1
1Center for Microscopy and Microanalysis, Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.
Abstract:
Filopodia are sensors which, along with microtubules, regulate the persistence of locomotion. To determine whether protrusions were involved in sensing adhesion, epithelial cells were cultured on platinum and tantalum gradients. Protrusions were defined by an unbiased statistical method of classification as factors 4 (filopodia), 5 (mass distribution), and 7 (nascent neurites). When the prevalence of protrusions was measured in zones of high (H), middle (M), and low (L) adhesiveness, the main differences were in factor 4. Its values were highest at H and declined at M and L regardless of the gradient composition. The significance of the differences was enhanced when T (top/adhesive end) and B (bottom/nonadhesive end) sides of cells were analyzed separately. Since information about sidedness increased the statistical power of the test, this result suggested that cells pointed more filopodia toward the adhesive end. Trends occurred in factors 5 and 7 only when conditions allowed for a marked trend in factor 4. The data showed that gradient sensing is proportional to the prevalence of filopodia, and filopodia are the only protrusions engaged in comparing adhesiveness across a cell. The probability (P) of the significance of a trend was then used to determine how cells sense the gradient. Binding peptides (BPs) were introduced representing sequences critical for Cdc42 docking on a specific partner. BPs for IQGAP (IQ(calmodulin-binding domain)-containing GTPase-activating protein) and ACK (Cdc42-associated kinase) reduced factor 4 values and prevented cell orientation on the gradient. Micrographs showed attenuated or stubby filopodia. These effectors may be implicated in gradient sensing. Another IQGAP BP increased filopodia prevalence and enhanced orientation on the gradient (P<0.00015). A Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) BP had no effect. When sensing and orientation were abolished, they both failed at the level of filopodia, indicating that filopodia are both sensors and implementers of signals transduced by adhesion.
More Related Videos
09:40Imaging G-protein Coupled Receptor GPCR-mediated Signaling Events that Control Chemotaxis of Dictyostelium Discoideum
Published on: September 20, 2011
08:12A Graphical User Interface for Software-assisted Tracking of Protein Concentration in Dynamic Cellular Protrusions
Published on: July 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Filopodia Formation
Their main function is to guide migrating cells during normal tissue morphogenesis or cancer metastasis by recognizing and making initial contacts with the extracellular matrix. However, they can also act as stationary cell anchors or help to establish communication...
Cell Polarization by Rho Proteins
Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration
Polarity of the Cytoskeleton
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation
Actin Polymerization and Cell Motility
Actin cytoskeleton dynamics can produce pushing, pulling, and resistance forces that help the cell to migrate....