Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Nonspecific abdominal pain in pediatric primary care: evaluation and outcomes
Elizabeth M Wallis1, Alexander G Fiks2
1Division of General Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Insights
Most children with nonspecific abdominal pain (AP) in primary care do not get a diagnosis, and many experience persistent pain. Diagnostic testing is rarely helpful, supporting conservative management for pediatric AP.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Primary Care
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- Nonspecific abdominal pain (AP) is a common reason for pediatric primary care visits.
- Understanding the evaluation and outcomes of children with AP is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize children with nonspecific abdominal pain in primary care.
- To evaluate diagnostic testing and outcomes, including persistent pain and diagnosis rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 375 children aged 4-12 years with AP.
- Analysis of diagnostic testing (laboratory and radiology) and pain persistence over 6-24 months.
- Multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of persistent pain and diagnosis.
Main Results:
- 18% of children experienced persistent AP.
- 70% of the cohort did not receive a specific diagnosis.
- Diagnostic testing yielded a diagnosis in only 3% of laboratory evaluations and was not associated with receiving a diagnosis.
- Pain duration >7 days predicted persistent pain (OR 2.15).
Conclusions:
- The majority of children with nonspecific AP remain undiagnosed.
- Persistent pain is common, and diagnostic testing is often unrevealing.
- Findings support limited diagnostic testing and conservative management strategies for pediatric AP.
Objective:
To describe the characteristics of children with nonspecific abdominal pain (AP) in primary care, their evaluation, and their outcomes.
Methods:
Between 2007 and 2009, a retrospective cohort of children from 5 primary care practices was followed from an index visit with AP until a well-child visit 6 to 24 months later (outcome visit). Using International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision (ICD-9), codes and chart review, we identified afebrile children between 4 and 12 years old with AP. Use of diagnostic testing was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association of index visit clinical and demographic variables with persistent pain at the outcome visit, and receipt of a specific diagnosis.
Results:
Three hundred seventy-five children presented with AP, representing 1% of the total population of 4- to 12-year-olds during the study period. Eighteen percent of children had persistent pain, and 70% of the study cohort never received a specific diagnosis for their pain. Seventeen percent and 14% of children had laboratory and radiology testing at the index visit, respectively. Only 3% of laboratory evaluations helped to yield a diagnosis. Among variables considered, only preceding pain of more than 7 days at the index visit was associated with persistent pain (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.19-3.89). None of the variables considered was associated with receiving a specific diagnosis.
Conclusions:
Most children with AP do not receive a diagnosis, many have persistent pain, and very few receive a functional AP diagnosis. Results support limited use of diagnostic testing and conservative management consistent with national policy statements.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
09:49Assessment of Perigenital Sensitivity and Prostatic Mast Cell Activation in a Mouse Model of Neonatal Maternal Separation
Published on: August 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management